Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29656903›Full record

ArticleKidney international2018

Improving the prognosis of patients with severely decreased glomerular filtration rate (CKD G4+): conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference.

Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Nisha Bansal, Josef Coresh, Marie Evans, Morgan E Grams, Charles A Herzog, Matthew T James, Hiddo J L Heerspink, Carol A Pollock, Paul E Stevens and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Risk-based referral model to nephrologist specialist care in Stockholm.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Kai-Uwe EckardtDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: kai-uwe.eckardt@charite.de.
Nisha BansalKidney Research Institute, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Josef CoreshDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Marie EvansDivision of Renal Medicine, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Swedish Renal Registry, Jönköping, Sweden.
Morgan E GramsDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Charles A HerzogChronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Matthew T JamesDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Hiddo J L HeerspinkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Carol A PollockDepartment of Renal Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Paul E StevensKent Kidney Care Centre, East Kent Hospitals, University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Manjula Kurella TamuraVA Palo Alto Geriatric Research and Education Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA; Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Marcello A TonelliDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
David C WheelerUniversity College London, London, UK.
Wolfgang C WinkelmayerSelzman Institute for Kidney Health, Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael CheungKDIGO, Brussels, Belgium.
Brenda R HemmelgarnDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: brenda.hemmelgarn@ahs.ca.
Conference Participants
University of Calgary · CAJohns Hopkins University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust · GBKarolinska Institutet · SERoyal North Shore Hospital · AUStanford University · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Epidemiology and management of chronic kidney disease in South AsiansK23DK101826 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ANAND, SHUCHI · 2014 to 2018
$919k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK101826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with severely decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (i.e., chronic kidney disease [CKD] G4+) are at increased risk for kidney failure, cardiovascular disease (CVD) events (including heart failure), and death. However, little is known about the variability of outcomes and optimal therapeutic strategies, including initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) organized a Controversies Conference with an international expert group in December 2016 to address this gap in knowledge. In collaboration with the CKD Prognosis Consortium (CKD-PC) a global meta-analysis of cohort studies (n = 264,515 individuals with CKD G4+) was conducted to better understand the timing of clinical outcomes in patients with CKD G4+ and risk factors for different outcomes. The results confirmed the prognostic value of traditional CVD risk factors in individuals with severely decreased GFR, although the risk estimates vary for kidney and CVD outcomes. A 2- and 4-year model of the probability and timing of kidney failure requiring KRT was also developed. The implications of these findings for patient management were discussed in the context of published evidence under 4 key themes: management of CKD G4+, diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of heart failure, shared decision-making, and optimization of clinical trials in CKD G4+ patients. Participants concluded that variable prognosis of patients with advanced CKD mandates individualized, risk-based management, factoring in competing risks and patient preferences.

Indexed as

Glomerular Filtration RateClinical Decision-MakingConsensusEvidence-Based MedicineHumansKidneyNephrologyPrognosisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness Indexchronic kidney diseasekidney failurepredictionprognosisprogressionsupportive care

Identifiers

PMID29656903
PMCPMC5998808
OpenAlexW2797818831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.