Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29656847›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2018

The association between hardship and self-rated health: does the choice of indicator matter?

Gillian L Marshall, Reginald Tucker-Seeley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Stress across the lifecourse and adult mental and physical health outcomes.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Content Validity of a Scale Designed to Measure the Access of Older Adults to Outpatient Health Services.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gillian L MarshallAssistant Professor, University of Washington, Tacoma, Social Work Program, Tacoma, WA. Electronic address: geegee@uw.edu.
Reginald Tucker-SeeleyEdward L. Schneider Assistant Professor of Gerontology, Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

Financial Strain on Mental and Physical Health - Does Race/Ethnicity MatterK01AG048416 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARSHALL, GILLIAN L · 2015 to 2019
$871k
Financial well-being following prostate cancer diagnosisK01CA169041 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TUCKER-SEELEY, REGINALD D. · 2012 to 2016
$675k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA169041NIA NIH HHS K01 AG048416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the association between four specific forms of hardship (difficulty paying bills, ongoing financial stress, medication reduction due to cost, and food insecurity) and self-rated health among older men and women.

methodsCross-sectional logistic regression analysis was conducted using the 2010 wave of the Health and Retirement Study Leave-Behind Questionnaire (N = 7619) to determine the association between four hardship indicators and self-rated health. Hardship indicators (difficulty paying bills, ongoing financial stress, medication reduction due to cost, and food insecurity) were dichotomized (0 = no hardship, 1 = yes hardship) for this analysis.

resultsAfter adjusting for sociodemographic factors, participants reporting difficulty paying bills had an 1.8 higher odds of reporting poor self-rated health (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.57, 2.15) and those reporting taking less medication due to cost had a 2.5 times higher odds of poor self-rated health (95% CI: 1.97, 3.09) compared to those not reporting these hardships. When stratified by gender, and adjusting for sociodemographic factors, men who took less medication due to cost had a 1.93 higher odds of low self-rated health (95% CI: 1.39, 2.67) and women who took less medications due to cost had a 2.9 higher odds of reporting poor self-rated health (95% CI: 2.23, 2.70) compared to women not reporting these hardships.

conclusionsResearch in this area can provide greater conceptual and measurement clarity on the hardship experience and further elucidate the pathway between specific hardships and poor health outcomes to inform intervention development.

Indexed as

IncomeAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood SupplyHealth Services AccessibilityHealth StatusHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPovertyGender differencesHardshipHealthMeasurementSelf-rated health

Identifiers

PMID29656847
PMCPMC5986601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.