Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29656716›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2018

Assessing food security using household consumption expenditure surveys (HCES): a scoping literature review.

Joanna Russell, Anne Lechner, Quentin Hanich, Aurélie Delisle, Brooke Campbell, Karen Charlton

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. RawJournal of food composition and analysis : an official publication of the United Nations University, International Network of Food Data Systems · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joanna Russell1School of Health and Society,University of Wollongong,Northfields Avenue,Wollongong,NSW 2522,Australia.
Anne Lechner2Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security (ANCORS),University of Wollongong,Wollongong,Australia.
Quentin Hanich2Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security (ANCORS),University of Wollongong,Wollongong,Australia.
Aurélie Delisle2Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security (ANCORS),University of Wollongong,Wollongong,Australia.
Brooke Campbell2Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security (ANCORS),University of Wollongong,Wollongong,Australia.
Karen Charlton3School of Medicine,University of Wollongong,Wollongong,Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo meet some of the UN's seventeen Sustainable Development Goals by 2030, there is a need for more effective policy to reduce food insecurity in low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMIC). Measuring progress towards these goals requires reliable indicators of food security in these countries. Routinely conducted household consumption and expenditure surveys (HCES) provide potentially valuable and nationally representative data sets for this purpose. The present study aimed to assess methods used to determine national food security status using proxy measures from HCES data in LMIC globally.

designA scoping literature review was conducted using electronic databases. Of the 929 abstracts identified, a total of twenty articles were reviewed against strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and included for further analysis.

resultsFourteen LMIC globally were represented in the twenty articles. The simplest metric used to indicate food insecurity compared household food expenditure against a level of expenditure considered to be below the poverty line. Data on acquisition of food was commonly converted to available energy for the household using local food composition tables and expressed as a proportion of household total energy requirements. Dietary diversity was also assessed in some studies as well as experience of food insecurity.

conclusionsThe review demonstrated that routinely collected HCES data sets provide a useful resource for the measurement of household food security in often resource-limited LMIC. Standardisation of methods used to assess food security is needed to allow for more useful comparisons between countries, as well as to assess temporal trends.

Indexed as

Diet SurveysFood SupplyAdultEnergy MetabolismFemaleHumansMalePovertyYoung AdultFood povertyFood securityHousehold consumption and expenditure surveysLow- and middle-income countriesSustainable Development Goals

Identifiers

PMID29656716
PMCPMC11106015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.