Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29656714›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2018

Epidemiology of sepsis in intensive care units in Turkey: a multicenter, point-prevalence study.

Nur Baykara, Halis Akalın, Mustafa Kemal Arslantaş, Volkan Hancı, Çiğdem Çağlayan, Ferda Kahveci, Kubilay Demirağ, Canan Baydemir, Necmettin Ünal, Sepsis Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03249246 (Epidemiology of Sepsis in Turkish ICUs), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03249246 completednot on this map

Epidemiology of Sepsis in Turkish ICUs :a National Point Prevalence Multi-centre Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorNur BaykaraRan2016 to 2016Enrolled1,499ConditionsSepsis, Septic Shock, Severe SepsisArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sepsis: An Overview of Current Therapies and Future Research.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nur BaykaraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, School of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey. Nur.Baykara@yahoo.com.
Halis AkalınDepartment of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey.
Mustafa Kemal ArslantaşDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Volkan HancıDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey.
Çiğdem ÇağlayanDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Ferda KahveciDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, School of Medicine, Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey.
Kubilay DemirağDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, School of Medicine, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.
Canan BaydemirDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical informatics, School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Necmettin ÜnalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Sepsis Study Group
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ · TRAnkara University · TRDokuz Eylül University · TREge University · TRKocaeli Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence and mortality of sepsis are largely unknown in Turkey, a country with high antibiotic resistance. A national, multicenter, point-prevalence study was conducted to determine the prevalence, causative microorganisms, and outcome of sepsis in intensive care units (ICUs) in Turkey.

methodsA total of 132 ICUs from 94 hospitals participated. All patients (aged > 18 years) present at the participating ICUs or admitted for any duration within a 24-h period (08:00 on January 27, 2016 to 08:00 on January 28, 2016) were included. The presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), severe sepsis, and septic shock were assessed and documented based on the consensus criteria of the American College of Chest Physicians and Society of Critical Care Medicine (SEPSIS-I) in infected patients. Patients with septic shock were also assessed using the SEPSIS-III definitions. Data regarding demographics, illness severity, comorbidities, microbiology, therapies, length of stay, and outcomes (dead/alive during 30 days) were recorded.

resultsOf the 1499 patients included in the analysis, 237 (15.8%) had infection without SIRS, 163 (10.8%) had infection with SIRS, 260 (17.3%) had severe sepsis without shock, and 203 (13.5%) had septic shock. The mortality rates were higher in patients with severe sepsis (55.7%) and septic shock (70.4%) than those with infection alone (24.8%) and infection + SIRS (31.2%) (p < 0.001). According to SEPSIS-III, 104 (6.9%) patients had septic shock (mortality rate, 75.9%). The respiratory system (71.6%) was the most common site of infection, and Acinetobacter spp. (33.7%) were the most common isolated pathogen. Approximately, 74.9%, 39.1%, and 26.5% of Acinetobacter, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas spp. isolates, respectively, were carbapenem-resistant, which was not associated with a higher mortality risk. Age, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score at ICU admission, sequential organ failure assessment score on study day, solid organ malignancy, presence of severe sepsis or shock, Candida spp. infection, renal replacement treatment, and a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:4 (compared with a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:2) were independent predictors of mortality in infected patients.

conclusionsA high prevalence of sepsis and an unacceptably high mortality rate were observed in Turkish ICUs. Although the prevalence of carbapenem resistance was high in Turkish ICUs, it was not associated with a higher risk for mortality.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03249246 . Date: August 15, 2017. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter InfectionsAgedAPACHECross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsKlebsiella InfectionsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPseudomonas InfectionsSepsisShock, SepticCarbapenem resistanceIntensive carePoint prevalenceSepsisTurkey

Identifiers

PMID29656714
PMCPMC5901868
OpenAlexW2803092788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.