ArticleCritical care (London, England)2018
Epidemiology of sepsis in intensive care units in Turkey: a multicenter, point-prevalence study.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03249246 (Epidemiology of Sepsis in Turkish ICUs), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Epidemiology of Sepsis in Turkish ICUs :a National Point Prevalence Multi-centre Study.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and the mortality of patients with sepsis: an update systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of focused cardiopulmonary ultrasonography on clinical outcome of septic shock: a randomized study.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Trial
- Distribution of Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli and Carbapenem Resistance Profiles in Intensive Care Units of a Foundation University Hospital: A 2023-2025 Retrospective Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Impact of COVID-19 and earthquake disaster on candidemia in the ICU: mortality and treatment outcomes.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Immune Endotype-Guided Precision Immunotherapy in Sepsis: From Transcriptomics to Bedside Application.Cureus · 2026Review
- The value of interleukin-6 (IL-6), neuropilin-1 (Nrp-1) and amphiregulin (AREG) levels in predicting mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with a pre-diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Observational
- Susceptibility Trends of Enterobacterales Isolated from Blood Culture Samples: A Four-Year Analysis with the Rise of Carbapenem Resistance.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Bile acid dysregulation in sepsis: mechanisms, clinical implications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Emergency one-stage endoscopic treatment in the older adults with acute cholangitis with choledocholithiasis: a propensity score-matched analysis.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical pharmacist-led medication review in patients with sepsis and septic shock in the intensive care unit: a non-randomized controlled study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Immunodynamic Disruption in Sepsis: Mechanisms and Strategies for Personalized Immunomodulation.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Study on Treatment Adoption and Associated Factors.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Sepsis Burden in a Major Romanian Emergency Center-An 18-Year Retrospective Analysis of Mortality and Risk Factors.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- The frequency of sepsis-associated delirium in intensive care unit and its effect on nurse workload.Journal of clinical nursing · 2025Article
- Patients admitted in the intensive care unit after solid organ or bone marrow transplantation: Retrospective cohort study.World journal of transplantation · 2025Article
- Sepsis: An Overview of Current Therapies and Future Research.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2025Review
- Relationship between the geriatric nutritional risk index and sepsis in elderly critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Antibiotic resistance in the Middle East and Southern Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Review
- Developing a rapid screening tool for high-risk ICU patients of sepsis: integrating electronic medical records with machine learning methods for mortality prediction in hospitalized patients-model establishment, internal and external validation, and visualization.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- A multicentre prospective registry of one thousand sepsis patients admitted in Indian ICUs: (SEPSIS INDIA) study.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence and mortality of sepsis are largely unknown in Turkey, a country with high antibiotic resistance. A national, multicenter, point-prevalence study was conducted to determine the prevalence, causative microorganisms, and outcome of sepsis in intensive care units (ICUs) in Turkey.
methodsA total of 132 ICUs from 94 hospitals participated. All patients (aged > 18 years) present at the participating ICUs or admitted for any duration within a 24-h period (08:00 on January 27, 2016 to 08:00 on January 28, 2016) were included. The presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), severe sepsis, and septic shock were assessed and documented based on the consensus criteria of the American College of Chest Physicians and Society of Critical Care Medicine (SEPSIS-I) in infected patients. Patients with septic shock were also assessed using the SEPSIS-III definitions. Data regarding demographics, illness severity, comorbidities, microbiology, therapies, length of stay, and outcomes (dead/alive during 30 days) were recorded.
resultsOf the 1499 patients included in the analysis, 237 (15.8%) had infection without SIRS, 163 (10.8%) had infection with SIRS, 260 (17.3%) had severe sepsis without shock, and 203 (13.5%) had septic shock. The mortality rates were higher in patients with severe sepsis (55.7%) and septic shock (70.4%) than those with infection alone (24.8%) and infection + SIRS (31.2%) (p < 0.001). According to SEPSIS-III, 104 (6.9%) patients had septic shock (mortality rate, 75.9%). The respiratory system (71.6%) was the most common site of infection, and Acinetobacter spp. (33.7%) were the most common isolated pathogen. Approximately, 74.9%, 39.1%, and 26.5% of Acinetobacter, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas spp. isolates, respectively, were carbapenem-resistant, which was not associated with a higher mortality risk. Age, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score at ICU admission, sequential organ failure assessment score on study day, solid organ malignancy, presence of severe sepsis or shock, Candida spp. infection, renal replacement treatment, and a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:4 (compared with a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:2) were independent predictors of mortality in infected patients.
conclusionsA high prevalence of sepsis and an unacceptably high mortality rate were observed in Turkish ICUs. Although the prevalence of carbapenem resistance was high in Turkish ICUs, it was not associated with a higher risk for mortality.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03249246 . Date: August 15, 2017. Retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.