ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2018
Hybrid T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Free-Breathing Hybrid Technique for Simultaneous Morphological and Quantitative Abdominal Imaging at 0.55 T.Investigative radiology · 2026Article
- Abdominal MR Multitasking for radiotherapy treatment planning: A motion-resolved and multicontrast 3D imaging approach.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Golden-Angle Radial MRI: Basics, Advances, and Applications.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Review
- TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Magnetization-prepared GRASP MRI for rapid 3D T1 mapping and fat/water-separated T1 mapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Free-breathing radial imaging using a pilot-tone radiofrequency transmitter for detection of respiratory motion.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- An efficient 3D stack-of-stars turbo spin echo pulse sequence for simultaneous T2-weighted imaging and T2 mapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- Post-contrast T1-weighted spine 3T MRI in children using a golden-angle radial acquisition.Neuroradiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMost clinical MR examinations require acquisition of different image contrasts. For abdominal exams, the scans are conventionally performed as separate acquisitions using respiratory gating or repeated breath holding, which can be time-inefficient and challenging for patients. Here, a hybrid imaging approach is described that creates T THEORY AND
methodsT
resultsAs validated in simulations and phantom scans, GRE acquisition in the wait time has minor effect on the signal strength and contrast. Volunteer scans at 1.5T showed that T
conclusionThe described hybrid sequence enables comprehensive T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.