Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29656311›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2018

Consensus Paper: Neurophysiological Assessments of Ataxias in Daily Practice.

W Ilg, M Branscheidt, A Butala, P Celnik, L de Paola, F B Horak, L Schöls, H A G Teive, A P Vogel, D S Zee and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Capture of Longitudinal Change in Real-Life Walking in Cerebellar Ataxia Increases Patient Relevance and Effect Size.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Neurophysiology of cerebellar ataxias and gait disorders.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. The reliability of cerebellar brain inhibition.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nystagmus characteristics of healthy controls.Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

W IlgDepartment of Cognitive Neurology and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 25, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. winfried.ilg@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1537-1336
M BranscheidtThe Human Brain Physiology and Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
A ButalaDepartment of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
P CelnikThe Human Brain Physiology and Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
L de PaolaEpilepsy Service & EEG Lab, Neurology Service, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital de Clinicas, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
F B HorakDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
L SchölsDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
H A G TeiveMovement Disorders Unit, Neurology Service, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital de Clinicas, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
A P VogelDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
D S ZeeDepartment of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
D TimmannDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Johns Hopkins University · USHospital de Clínicas Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen · DEEssen University Hospital · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEOregon Health & Science University · USThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this consensus paper is to review electrophysiological abnormalities and to provide a guideline of neurophysiological assessments in cerebellar ataxias. All authors agree that standard electrophysiological methods should be systematically applied in all cases of ataxia to reveal accompanying peripheral neuropathy, the involvement of the dorsal columns, pyramidal tracts and the brainstem. Electroencephalography should also be considered, although findings are frequently non-specific. Electrophysiology helps define the neuronal systems affected by the disease in an individual patient and to understand the phenotypes of the different types of ataxia on a more general level. As yet, there is no established electrophysiological measure which is sensitive and specific of cerebellar dysfunction in ataxias. The authors agree that cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI), which is based on a paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm assessing cerebellar-cortical connectivity, is likely a useful measure of cerebellar function. Although its role in the investigation and diagnoses of different types of ataxias is unclear, it will be of interest to study its utility in this type of conditions. The authors agree that detailed clinical examination reveals core features of ataxia (i.e., dysarthria, truncal, gait and limb ataxia, oculomotor dysfunction) and is sufficient for formulating a differential diagnosis. Clinical assessment of oculomotor function, especially saccades and the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) which are most easily examined both at the bedside and with quantitative testing techniques, is of particular help for differential diagnosis in many cases. Pure clinical measures, however, are not sensitive enough to reveal minute fluctuations or early treatment response as most relevant for pre-clinical stages of disease which might be amenable to study in future intervention trials. The authors agree that quantitative measures of ataxia are desirable as biomarkers. Methods are discussed that allow quantification of ataxia in laboratory as well as in clinical and real-life settings, for instance at the patients' home. Future studies are needed to demonstrate their usefulness as biomarkers in pharmaceutical or rehabilitation trials.

Indexed as

Cerebellar AtaxiaElectrodiagnosisHumansAtaxiaCerebellumDysarthriaElectroencephalographyEpilepsyEvoked potentialsEye movementsGaitNerve conduction studiesNeuropathyPostureSaccadesStanceTranscranial magnetic stimulationVestibulo-ocular reflex

Identifiers

PMID29656311
OpenAlexW2796506848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.