Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29656237›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2018

Vascularized microfluidic organ-chips for drug screening, disease models and tissue engineering.

Tatsuya Osaki, Vivek Sivathanu, Roger D Kamm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cell reprogramming: methods, mechanisms and applications.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Tissue chips as headway model and incitement technology.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tatsuya OsakiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Vivek SivathanuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Roger D KammDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; BioSystems and Micromechanics (BioSyM), Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: rdkamm@mit.edu.

Funding

Development of Physiologic Tissue Models to Assess Tumor Explant Response to Immune Checkpoint BlockadeU01CA214381 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BARBIE, DAVID A, KAMM, ROGER D · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
Microfluidic 3D Assays for Metastatic CancerR33CA174550 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KAMM, ROGER D · 2013 to 2015
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA174550NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascularization of micro-tissues in vitro has enabled formation of tissues larger than those limited by diffusion with appropriate nutrient/gas exchange as well as waste elimination. Furthermore, angiocrine signaling from the vasculature may be essential in mimicking organ-level functions in these micro-tissues. In drug screening applications, the presence of an appropriate blood-organ barrier in the form of a vasculature and its supporting cells (pericytes, appropriate stromal cells) may be essential to reproducing organ-scale drug delivery pharmacokinetics. Cutting-edge techniques including 3D bioprinting and in vitro angiogenesis and vasculogenesis could be applied to vascularize a range of tissues and organoids. Herein, we describe the latest developments in vascularization and prevascularization of micro-tissues and provide an outlook on potential future strategies.

Indexed as

Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalBioprintingHumansMicrofluidicsNeovascularization, PhysiologicOrgan SpecificityTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID29656237
PMCPMC6082713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.