Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29656084›Full record

ArticleJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences2018

A sensitive and rapid ultra high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric assay for the simultaneous quantitation of cyclophosphamide and the 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide metabolite in human plasma.

O Morgan Hall, Cody J Peer, Courtney D Fitzhugh, William D Figg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

O Morgan HallClinical Pharmacology Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Cody J PeerClinical Pharmacology Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Courtney D FitzhughSickle Cell Branch, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.
William D FiggClinical Pharmacology Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States. Electronic address: wf13e@nih.gov.
National Cancer Institute · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · US

Funding

Nonmyeloablative haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in congenital anemiasZIAHL006211 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI FITZHUGH, COURTNEY · 2016 to 2025
$19.4M
Using Clinical Pharmacology Principles to Develop New Anticancer TherapiesZICSC006537 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI FIGG, WILLIAM DOUGLAS · 2009 to 2025
$14.4M
Sample Processing and Analytical Methods Development for New Anticancer AgentsZ01SC006536 · SC · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI FIGG, WILLIAM DOUGLAS · 1997 to 2008
$731k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 SC006536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of cyclophosphamide (CP) and its metabolite, 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (4OHCP), in a single assay has the ability to improve sampling techniques benefitting both the patients who are receiving the drug and the clinicians drawing samples. Due to instability in plasma (t

Indexed as

Chromatography, High Pressure LiquidCyclophosphamideHumansLimit of DetectionLinear ModelsReproducibility of ResultsTandem Mass Spectrometry4-hydroxycyclophosphamideCyclophosphamide4-hydroxycyclophosphamideCyclophosphamideSickle cell diseaseTandem mass spectrometryUltra-high performance liquid chromatography

Identifiers

PMID29656084
PMCPMC5927828
OpenAlexW2796843835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.