Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29655936›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Dynamic causal modelling on infant fNIRS data: A validation study on a simultaneously recorded fNIRS-fMRI dataset.

Chiara Bulgarelli, Anna Blasi, Simon Arridge, Samuel Powell, Carina C J M de Klerk, Victoria Southgate, Sabrina Brigadoi, William Penny, Sungho Tak, Antonia Hamilton

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Chiara BulgarelliCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: c.bulga01@mail.bbk.ac.uk.
Anna BlasiCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London, United Kingdom.
Simon ArridgeCentre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, United Kingdom.
Samuel PowellDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, United Kingdom.
Carina C J M de KlerkCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London, United Kingdom.
Victoria SouthgateDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sabrina BrigadoiDepartment of Developmental Psychology, University of Padova, Italy.
William PennySchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Sungho TakBioimaging Research Team, Korea Basic Science Institute, South Korea.
Antonia HamiltonInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, United Kingdom.
Birkbeck, University of London · GBUniversity College London · GBKorea Basic Science Institute · KRUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracking the connectivity of the developing brain from infancy through childhood is an area of increasing research interest, and fNIRS provides an ideal method for studying the infant brain as it is compact, safe and robust to motion. However, data analysis methods for fNIRS are still underdeveloped compared to those available for fMRI. Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) is an advanced connectivity technique developed for fMRI data, that aims to estimate the coupling between brain regions and how this might be modulated by changes in experimental conditions. DCM has recently been applied to adult fNIRS, but not to infants. The present paper provides a proof-of-principle for the application of this method to infant fNIRS data and a demonstration of the robustness of this method using a simultaneously recorded fMRI-fNIRS single case study, thereby allowing the use of this technique in future infant studies. fMRI and fNIRS were simultaneously recorded from a 6-month-old sleeping infant, who was presented with auditory stimuli in a block design. Both fMRI and fNIRS data were preprocessed using SPM, and analysed using a general linear model approach. The main challenges that adapting DCM for fNIRS infant data posed included: (i) the import of the structural image of the participant for spatial pre-processing, (ii) the spatial registration of the optodes on the structural image of the infant, (iii) calculation of an accurate 3-layer segmentation of the structural image, (iv) creation of a high-density mesh as well as (v) the estimation of the NIRS optical sensitivity functions. To assess our results, we compared the values obtained for variational Free Energy (F), Bayesian Model Selection (BMS) and Bayesian Model Average (BMA) with the same set of possible models applied to both the fMRI and fNIRS datasets. We found high correspondence in F, BMS, and BMA between fMRI and fNIRS data, therefore showing for the first time high reliability of DCM applied to infant fNIRS data. This work opens new avenues for future research on effective connectivity in infancy by contributing a data analysis pipeline and guidance for applying DCM to infant fNIRS data.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionBrainChild DevelopmentConnectomeFunctional NeuroimagingHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredDCMEffective connectivityInfantsSimultaneous fMRI-fNIRS recording

Identifiers

PMID29655936
PMCPMC5971219
OpenAlexW2797392161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.