Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29655873›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2018

Media portrayal of prenatal and postpartum marijuana use in an era of scientific uncertainty.

Marian Jarlenski, Jonathan W Koma, Jennifer Zank, Lisa M Bodnar, Jill A Tarr, Judy C Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Marijuana Use in Pregnancy: A Review.Obstetrical & gynecological survey · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marian JarlenskiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, United States. Electronic address: marian.jarlenski@pitt.edu.
Jonathan W KomaUniversity Honors College, University of Pittsburgh, United States.
Jennifer ZankDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Magee-Women's Hospital, United States.
Lisa M BodnarDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, United States; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Women's Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, United States.
Jill A TarrDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Women's Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, United States.
Judy C ChangDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Women's Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, United States.

Funding

Building Research Careers in Women's HealthK12HD043441 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI SADOVSKY, YOEL · 2002 to 2023
$10.1M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObjectives were to characterize how scientific information about prenatal and postpartum marijuana use was presented in online media content, and to assess how media portrayed risks and benefits of such marijuana use.

methodsWe analyzed online media items (n = 316) from March 2015 to January 2017. A codebook was developed to measure media content in 4 domains: scientific studies, information about health and well-being, mode of ingestion, and portrayal of risks and benefits. Content analysis was performed by two authors, with high inter-rater reliability (mean ĸ = 0.82). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize content, and regression analyses were used to test for predictors of media portrayal of the risk-benefit ratio of prenatal and postpartum marijuana use.

results51% of the media items mentioned health risks of prenatal and postpartum marijuana use. Nearly one-third (28%) mentioned marijuana use for treatment of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. Most media items mentioned a specific research study. More than half of media (59%) portrayed prenatal or postpartum marijuana risks > benefits, 10% portrayed benefits> risks, and the remainder were neutral. While mention of a scientific study was not predictive of the portrayal of the risk-benefit ratio of marijuana use in pregnancy or postpartum, discussion of health risks and health benefits predicted portrayals of the risk-benefit ratio.

conclusionsOnline media content about prenatal and postpartum marijuana use presented health risks consistent with evidence, and discussed a health benefit of marijuana use for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. Portrayal of risks and benefits was somewhat equivocal, consistent with current scientific debate.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMass MediaFemaleHumansMarijuana UsePostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentUncertaintyCommunicationsMarijuanaMediaPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29655873
PMCPMC5959784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.