Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29655499›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2018

Genetic Testing in Clinical Settings.

Nora Franceschini, Amber Frick, Jeffrey B Kopp

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Advancing Genetic Testing in Kidney Diseases: Report From a National Kidney Foundation Working Group.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Identification of Novel and Recurrent Variants inJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type II resulting from aWorld journal of clinical cases · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nora FranceschiniDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: noraf@unc.edu.
Amber FrickDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jeffrey B KoppKidney Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

Funding

Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Genetics & MechanismsZIADK043308 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI KOPP, JEFFREY BURNETT · 2009 to 2024
$15.7M
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: TreatmentZIADK043412 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI KOPP, JEFFREY BURNETT · 2009 to 2024
$7.4M
Leveraging ancestry to map kidney lociR01MD012765 · NIMHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FRANCESCHINI, NORA · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
APOL1, sickle cell trait and chronic kidney disease in African AmericansR56DK104806 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FRANCESCHINI, NORA, REINER, ALEXANDER P · 2016 to 2016
$300k
Trans-ethnic meta-analysis of blood pressure in African and European ancestriesR21HL123677 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FRANCESCHINI, NORA · 2014 to 2015
$242k
Phenome-wide association of protein function-altering variants in a family studyR21HL140385 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FRANCESCHINI, NORA · 2017 to 2018
$229k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL123677NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL140385NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK104806NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD012765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic testing is used for screening, diagnosis, and prognosis of diseases consistent with a genetic cause and to guide drug therapy to improve drug efficacy and avoid adverse effects (pharmacogenomics). This In Practice review aims to inform about DNA-related genetic test availability, interpretation, and recommended clinical actions based on results using evidence from clinical guidelines, when available. We discuss challenges that limit the widespread use of genetic information in the clinical care setting, including a small number of actionable genetic variants with strong evidence of clinical validity and utility, and the need for improving the health literacy of health care providers and the public, including for direct-to-consumer tests. Ethical, legal, and social issues and incidental findings also need to be addressed. Because our understanding of genetic factors associated with disease and drug response is rapidly increasing and new genetic tests are being developed that could be adopted by clinicians in the short term, we also provide extensive resources for information and education on genetic testing.

Indexed as

AgedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug Therapy, CombinationGenetic TestingHumansMaleMultimorbidityNeeds AssessmentPharmacogeneticsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Renal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk AssessmentUnited StatesancestryAPOL1drug dosingdrug selectionGenetic testinggene variantkidney diseasemutationpharmacogeneticspharmacogenomicspharmacokineticspolymorphismreviewrisk allele

Identifiers

PMID29655499
PMCPMC6153053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.