Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29654751›Full record

ArticleContraception2018

Continuation of injectable contraception when self-injected vs. administered by a facility-based health worker: a nonrandomized, prospective cohort study in Uganda.

Jane Cover, Allen Namagembe, Justine Tumusiime, Damalie Nsangi, Jeanette Lim, Dinah Nakiganda-Busiku

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jane CoverPATH, PO Box 900922, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Electronic address: jcover@path.org.
Allen NamagembePATH, PO Box 7404, Kampala, Uganda. Electronic address: anamagembe@path.org.
Justine TumusiimePATH, PO Box 7404, Kampala, Uganda. Electronic address: jtumusiime@path.org.
Damalie NsangiPATH, PO Box 7404, Kampala, Uganda. Electronic address: dnsangi@path.org.
Jeanette LimPATH, PO Box 900922, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Electronic address: jlim@path.org.
Dinah Nakiganda-BusikuUganda Ministry of Health, PO Box 7272, Kampala, Uganda. Electronic address: dinabusiku@hotmail.com.
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health · USMinistry of Health · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare 12-month continuation rates for subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) administered via self-injection and DMPA-IM administered by a health worker in Uganda. STUDY

designWomen seeking injectable contraception at participating health facilities were offered the choice of self-injecting DMPA-SC or receiving an injection of DMPA-IM from a health worker. Those opting for self-injection were trained one-on-one. They self-injected under supervision and took home three units, a client instruction guide and a reinjection calendar. Those opting for DMPA-IM received an injection and an appointment card for the next facility visit in 3 months. We interviewed participants at baseline (first injection) and after 3 (second injection), 6 (third injection) and 9 (fourth injection) months, or upon discontinuation. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate continuation probabilities, with a log-rank test to compare differences between groups. A multivariate Cox regression identified factors correlated with discontinuation.

resultsThe 12-month continuation rate for the 561 women self-injecting DMPA-SC was .81 [95% confidence interval (CI) .78-.84], and for 600 women receiving DMPA-IM from a health worker, it was .65 (95% CI .61-.69), a significant difference at the .05 level. There were no differences in pregnancy rates or side effects. The multivariate analysis revealed that, controlling for covariates, self-injecting reduced the hazard for discontinuing by 46%. A significant interaction between injection group and age suggests that self-injection may help younger women continue injectable use.

conclusionsThe significant difference in 12-month continuation between women self-injecting DMPA-SC and women receiving DMPA-IM from a health worker - which remains significant in a multivariate analysis - suggests that self-injection may improve injectable contraceptive continuation. IMPLICATIONS: While injectable contraceptives are popular throughout much of sub-Saharan Africa, they have high rates of discontinuation. This study is the second from an African country to demonstrate that self-injection may improve injectable continuation rates and may do so without increasing the risk of pregnancy or adverse events.

Indexed as

AdultCommunity Health WorkersContraceptive Agents, FemaleDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansInjectionsMedication AdherenceMedroxyprogesterone AcetateProspective StudiesSelf AdministrationYoung AdultContraceptive Agents, FemaleMedroxyprogesterone AcetateDiscontinuationDMPA-SCSayana® PressSelf-administrationSelf-injection

Identifiers

PMID29654751
PMCPMC6197833
OpenAlexW2797337609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.