ArticleInternational ophthalmology2019
Confocal scanning laser microscopy in patients with postoperative endophthalmitis.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate alterations of corneal layers in eyes treated for acute postoperative endophthalmitis.
methodsIn this retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study, eyes treated with 25 gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for acute post-cataract endophthalmitis (group A) were compared to eyes receiving uneventful cataract surgery (group B) and uneventful 25 gauge PPV for epiretinal membrane (group C). After a minimum follow-up of 8 months from last surgical procedure, laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) was performed.
resultsTwelve eyes for each group were recruited. Comparing study eyes with control eyes of group B and C, no statistical difference was found in corneal epithelial cell density (p = n.s.), in density of nerve fibers (p = n.s.), mean grade of nerve reflectivity (p = n.s.), mean grade of nerve tortuosity (p = n.s.), mean grade of anterior keratocyte activation (p = n.s.), and corneal endothelium cell density (p = n.s.), whereas a statistically higher mean grade of posterior keratocyte activation was found in group A (p < 0.01). Epithelial and endothelial corneal morphologies were graded as regular in all groups. Langerhans cells and corneal dendritic-shaped hyper-reflective endothelial deposits were found in group A. Both findings were absent in group B and C, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01).
conclusionsIVCM was a useful tool in the detection of microscopic chronic corneal abnormalities caused by postoperative endophthalmitis. These findings confirmed the presence of a subclinical chronic corneal inflammation localized to the posterior stroma that should be related to the infectious process. Future studies might clarify pathological processes in the acute phase of postoperative endophthalmitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.