SynthesisMusculoskeletal surgery2019
Reconstruction of failed acetabular component in the presence of severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcome of cages in revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum: a systematic review.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2019Pooled it
- Custom-Made 3D-Printed Implants for Paprosky Type 3A and 3B Acetabular Defects: Early Surgical and Functional Outcomes from a Multicentre Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Porous cementless cups combined with trabecular metal augments in revision hip arthroplasty: mid-term outcomes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Custom-made acetabular implants for revision total hip arthroplasty: postoperative evaluation of the accuracy of implant positioning.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Re-revision Following Failed Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Case of Neglected Inferior Dislocation of the Hip: An Interesting Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- A systematic review of custom 3D-printed acetabular components in revision arthroplasty for the management of extensive acetabular defects.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Review
- Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cups in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Has Been the Experience So Far?-A Systematic Literature Review.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Early Stabilization Does Not Increase Complication Rates in Acetabular Fractures of the Elderly: A Retrospective Analysis from the German Pelvis Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The Validation of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Host Bone Coverage in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Hip Dysplasia: A Comparison with Intra-Operative Measurements.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Custom triflange acetabular components for large acetabular defect reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 1218 patients.EFORT open reviews · 2023Article
- Is the construct stability of the acetabular cup affected by the acetabular screw configuration in bone defect models?Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Early clinical and radiological outcomes of the new porous titanium shell in combination with locking screw in revision total hip arthroplasty.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2023Article
- Reduction of posterior dislocated hip prosthesis using a modified lateral position maneuver: a retrospective, clinical comparative, and follow-up study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Influence of associated femoral head fractures on surgical outcomes following osteosynthesis in posterior wall acetabular fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- The optimal screw-hole positions of the eccentric revision cup based on a morphological study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Article
- Predicting the Poor Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes after the Anatomical Reduction and Internal Fixation of Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Computational Contact Pressure Prediction of CoCrMo, SS 316L and Ti6Al4V Femoral Head against UHMWPE Acetabular Cup under Gait Cycle.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Clinical and radiological outcomes of jumbo cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Good results at 2-year follow-up of a custom-made triflange acetabular component for large acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity: a prospective case series of 50 hips.Acta orthopaedica · 2021Article
- Impact of Acetabular Implant Design on Aseptic Failure in Total Hip Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acetabular revision especially in the presence of severe bone loss is challenging. There is a paucity of literature critiquing contemporary techniques of revision acetabular reconstruction and their outcomes. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature and to report clinical outcomes and survival of contemporary acetabular revision arthroplasty techniques (tantalum metal shells, uncemented revision jumbo shells, reinforced cages and rings, oblong shells and custom-made triflange constructs). Full-text papers and those with an abstract in English published from January 2001 to January 2016 were identified through international databases. A total of 50 papers of level IV scientific evidence, comprising 2811 hips in total, fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included. Overall, patients had improved outcomes irrespective of the technique of reconstruction as documented by postoperative hip scores. Our pooled analysis suggests that oblong cups components had a lower failure rate compared with other different materials considered in this review. Custom-made triflange cups had one of highest failure rates. However, this may reflect the complexity of revisions and severity of bone loss. The most common postoperative complication reported in all groups was dislocation. This review confirms successful acetabular reconstructions using diverse techniques depending on the type of bone loss and highlights key features and outcomes of different techniques. In particular, oblong cups and tantalum shells have successful survivorship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.