Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29654482›Full record

ArticleOecologia2018

Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators.

Peter M Haswell, Katherine A Jones, Josip Kusak, Matt W Hayward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spatial-Temporal Patterns of Sympatric Asiatic Black Bears (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Are British urban foxes (Ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Olfactory cues of large carnivores modify red deer behavior and browsing intensity.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter M HaswellSchool of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK. p.m.haswell@bangor.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3440-739X
Katherine A JonesSchool of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK.
Josip KusakDepartment of Biology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zagreb, Heinzelova 55, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Matt W HaywardSchool of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Where direct killing is rare and niche overlap low, sympatric carnivores may appear to coexist without conflict. Interference interactions, harassment and injury from larger carnivores may still pose a risk to smaller mesopredators. Foraging theory suggests that animals should adjust their behaviour accordingly to optimise foraging efficiency and overall fitness, trading off harvest rate with costs to fitness. The foraging behaviour of red foxes, Vulpes vulpes, was studied with automated cameras and a repeated measures giving-up density (GUD) experiment where olfactory risk cues were manipulated. In Plitvice Lakes National Park, Croatia, red foxes increased GUDs by 34% and quitting harvest rates by 29% in response to wolf urine. In addition to leaving more food behind, foxes also responded to wolf urine by spending less time visiting food patches each day and altering their behaviour in order to compensate for the increased risk when foraging from patches. Thus, red foxes utilised olfaction to assess risk and experienced foraging costs due to the presence of a cue from gray wolves, Canis lupus. This study identifies behavioural mechanisms which may enable competing predators to coexist, and highlights the potential for additional ecosystem service pathways arising from the behaviour of large carnivores. Given the vulnerability of large carnivores to anthropogenic disturbance, a growing human population and intensifying resource consumption, it becomes increasingly important to understand ecological processes so that land can be managed appropriately.

Indexed as

Predatory BehaviorWolvesAnimalsEcosystemFearFoxesHumansGiving-up densityGray wolfMesopredator releaseRed foxRisk

Identifiers

PMID29654482
PMCPMC6018578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.