Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29654477›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2018

Monitor yourself! Deficient error-related brain activity predicts real-life self-control failures.

Klaus-Martin Krönke, Max Wolff, Holger Mohr, Anja Kräplin, Michael N Smolka, Gerhard Bühringer, Thomas Goschke

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04498988 (Volitional Dysfunction in Self-control Failures and Addictive Behaviors), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04498988 completednot on this map

Volitional Dysfunction in Self-control Failures and Addictive Behaviors

TypeobservationalSponsorTechnische Universität DresdenRan2014 to 2024Enrolled338ConditionsAddictive Behavior, Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), Tobacco Use Disorder, Self-ControlArmsObservational study without interventions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Willpower Paradox: Possible and Impossible Conceptions of Self-Control.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Real-life self-control conflicts in anorexia nervosa: An ecological momentary assessment investigation.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Klaus-Martin KrönkeDepartment of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, 01062, Dresden, Germany. klaus-martin.kroenke@tu-dresden.de.
Max WolffDepartment of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Holger MohrDepartment of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Anja KräplinDepartment of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Michael N SmolkaDepartment of Psychiatry, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Gerhard BühringerDepartment of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas GoschkeDepartment of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
TU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their immense relevance, the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying real-life self-control failures (SCFs) are insufficiently understood. Whereas previous studies have shown that SCFs were associated with decreased activity in the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG; a region involved in cognitive control), here we consider the possibility that the reduced implementation of cognitive control in individuals with low self-control may be due to impaired performance monitoring. Following a brain-as-predictor approach, we combined experience sampling of daily SCFs with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a Stroop task. In our sample of 118 participants, proneness to SCF was reliably predicted by low error-related activation of a performance-monitoring network (comprising anterior mid-cingulate cortex, presupplementary motor area, and anterior insula), low posterror rIFG activation, and reduced posterror slowing. Remarkably, these neural and behavioral measures predicted variability in SCFs beyond what was predicted by self-reported trait self-control. These results suggest that real-life SCFs may result from deficient performance monitoring, leading to reduced recruitment of cognitive control after responses that conflict with superordinate goals.

Indexed as

Self-ControlAdultAttentionBrainBrain MappingExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansIndividualityMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleStroop TestYoung AdultCognitive controlExperience samplingIndividual differencesPerformance monitoringSelf-control

Identifiers

PMID29654477
OpenAlexW2797668335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.