Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29654434›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2018

Predictors for target lesion microcalcifications in patients with stable coronary artery disease: an optical coherence tomography study.

Sebastian Reith, Andrea Milzi, Rosalia Dettori, Nikolaus Marx, Mathias Burgmaier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Role of Inflammation in Cardiovascular Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Pathophysiology of Atherosclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Exosomes in atherosclerosis: Convergence on macrophages.International journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian ReithDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Clinic I, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. sreith@ukaachen.de.
Andrea MilziDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Clinic I, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Rosalia DettoriDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Clinic I, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Nikolaus MarxDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Clinic I, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Mathias BurgmaierDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Clinic I, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe minimal fibrous cap thickness overlying the necrotic lipid core as well as the presence of macrophages are established characteristics of coronary plaque vulnerability. Recently, the presence of microcalcifications has emerged as a novel feature of vulnerable lesions. However, clinical and plaque morphological predictors of microcalcifications are unknown.

methodsIn patients with stable coronary artery disease, analysis of plaque morphology (n = 112) was performed using optical coherence tomography prior to coronary intervention to assess predictors of microcalcifications.

resultsMicrocalcifications were present in 21/112 (18.7%) lesions. Segments with microcalcifications showed a higher total number of calcifications per lesion (6.7 ± 3.0 vs. 3.2 ± 2.5, p < 0.001), a lower percent area stenosis (70.9 ± 11.1 vs. 76.2 ± 9.7%, p = 0.028), and a higher frequency of macrophage infiltration (66.7 vs. 37.4%, p = 0.014). In lesions with vs. without microcalcifications, macrophage infiltration was characterized by a wider macrophage angle (31.1° ± 34.4° vs. 13.7° ± 20.6°, p = 0.003), a higher macrophage index (105.6 ± 269.0 vs. 31.6 ± 66.5° mm, p = 0.020), and an increased frequency of calcium-macrophage co-localization (47.6 vs. 15.6%, p = 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the total number of calcifications per lesion (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.23-1.91, p < 0.001), average macrophage angle (OR 1.28 for 10°-variation, 95% CI 1.03-1.60, p = 0.024), and percent area stenosis (OR 0.59 for 10% increase, 95% CI 0.34-1.04, p = 0.070) were independent predictors for the presence of microcalcifications, whereas the latter did not reach statistical significance.

conclusionMicrocalcifications are related to a less advanced stenosis severity and to extensive plaque inflammation, but not to clinical parameters. Our data may add to the understanding and role of microcalcifications in coronary artery lesions.

Indexed as

AgedCalcinosisCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePlaque, AtheroscleroticPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceMicrocalcificationOptical coherence tomographyPlaque morphologyPlaque vulnerability

Identifiers

PMID29654434
OpenAlexW2798080743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.