ArticleExperimental brain research2018
Inhibitory effects of eugenol on putative nociceptive response in spinal cord preparation isolated from neonatal rats.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Involvement of cannabinoid receptors in depression of the putative nociceptive response in spinal cord preparations isolated from neonatal rats.The journal of physiological sciences : JPS · 2023Article
- Co-Application of Eugenol and QX-314 Elicits the Prolonged Blockade of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels in Nociceptive Trigeminal Ganglion Neurons.Biomolecules · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Eugenol is contained in several plants including clove and is thought to exert an analgesic effect. It has been suggested that the slow ventral root potential induced by ipsilateral dorsal root stimulation in the isolated (typically lumbar) spinal cord of newborn rats reflects the nociceptive response, and this in vitro experimental model is useful to assess the actions of analgesics. To further elucidate neuronal mechanisms of eugenol-induced analgesia, we examined the effects of extracellularly applied eugenol on the nociceptive spinal reflex response. To evaluate the effects of eugenol on putative nociceptive responses, the ipsilateral fifth lumbar (L5) dorsal root was stimulated using a glass suction electrode, and the induced reflex responses were recorded from the L5 and twelfth thoracic (Th12) ventral roots in spinal cord preparations (Th10-L5) from newborn rats (postnatal day 0-3). We found that eugenol (0.25-1.0 mM) caused dose-dependent attenuation of the reflex response and also depressed spontaneous ventral root activity. We also found that the slow ventral root potential was further divided into two components: initial and late components. A lower concentration of eugenol selectively depressed the late component. The inhibitory effects by 1.0 mM eugenol were not reversed by 10 µM capsazepine (TRPV1 antagonist) or 40 µM HC-030031 (TRPA1 antagonist). The depressive effect of eugenol on the reflex response was also confirmed by optical recordings using voltage-sensitive dye. Our report provides additional evidence on the basic neuronal mechanisms of eugenol to support its clinical use as a potential analgesic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.