Abnormal saline and the history of intravenous fluids.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Comparison of balanced and unbalanced crystalloids as resuscitation fluid in patients treated for cardiogenic shock.Journal of intensive care · 2023
   Article
2. Early Recognition and Risk Stratification in Cardiogenic Shock: Well Begun Is Half Done.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
   Review
3. A brief history of crystalloids: the origin of the controversy.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023
   Review
4. Impact of chloride-rich crystalloids on sepsis-associated community-acquired acute kidney injury recovery in critically ill patients.Journal of nephrology · 2022
   Article
5. Intravenous fluid therapy in critically ill adults.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2018
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as