Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29654049›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Study protocol to assess the effectiveness and safety of a flexible family visitation model for delirium prevention in adult intensive care units: a cluster-randomised, crossover trial (The ICU Visits Study).

Regis Goulart Rosa, Maicon Falavigna, Caroline Cabral Robinson, Daiana Barbosa da Silva, Renata Kochhann, Rafaela Moraes de Moura, Mariana Martins Siqueira Santos, Daniel Sganzerla, Natalia Elis Giordani, Cláudia Eugênio and 25 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02932358 (Effectiveness and Safety of a Flexible Family Visitation Model for Delirium Prevention in Adult Intensive Care Units), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02932358 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness and Safety of a Flexible Family Visitation Model for Delirium Prevention in Adult Intensive Care Units: a Cluster-randomized, Crossover Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Moinhos de VentoRan2017 to 2018Enrolled1,650ConditionsDeliriumArmsFlexible Family Visitation Model (FFVM), Restrictive Family Visitation Model (RFVM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Visiting and Communication Policy in Intensive Care Units during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Survey from South Asia and the Middle East.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Regis Goulart RosaIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Maicon FalavignaInstitute for Education and Research, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Caroline Cabral RobinsonResearch Projects Office, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Daiana Barbosa da SilvaIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Renata KochhannResearch Projects Office, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Rafaela Moraes de MouraResearch Projects Office, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Mariana Martins Siqueira SantosResearch Projects Office, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Daniel SganzerlaResearch Projects Office, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Natalia Elis GiordaniResearch Projects Office, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Cláudia EugênioIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Tarissa RibeiroIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Alexandre Biasi CavalcantiResearch Institute, HCor, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando BozzaDepartment of Critical Care, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Luciano Cesar Pontes AzevedoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Flávia Ribeiro MachadoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Intensive Care, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Jorge Ibrain Figueira SalluhDepartment of Critical Care, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
José Augusto Santos PellegriniIntensive Care Unit, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Rafael Barberena MoraesIntensive Care Unit, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Taís HocheggerIntensive Care Unit, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Alexandre AmaralIntensive Care Unit, Hospital de Urgências de Goiânia, Goiânia, Brazil.
José Mario Meira TelesIntensive Care Unit, Hospital de Urgências de Goiânia, Goiânia, Brazil.
Lucas Gobetti da LuzIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Mirceli Goulart BarbosaResearch Projects Office, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Daniella Cunha BirrielIntensive Care Unit, Pavilhão Pereira Filho, Centro Histórico, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Iris de Lima FerrazIntensive Care Unit, Hospital de Urgência e Emergência de Rio Branco, Rio Branco, Brazil.
Vandack NobreIntensive Care Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Helen Martins ValentimIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Mãe de Deus, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Livia Corrêa E CastroIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Regional do Baixo Amazonas, Santarém, Brazil.
Péricles Almeida Delfino DuarteIntensive Care Unit, Hospital do Câncer de Cascavel, Cascavel, Brazil.
Rogério TregnagoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Tacchini, Bento Gonçalves, Brazil.
Sofia Louise Santin BarilliIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Nilton BrandãoDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Alberto GianniniUnit of Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ospedale dei Bambini - ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Cassiano TeixeiraIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
ICU Visits Study Group Investigators and the BRICNet
Intensive Care Society · GBHospital Moinhos de Vento · BRMinnesota Project · USD’Or Institute for Research and Education · BRHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRHospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição · BRHospital Sírio-Libanês · BRLaboratório Bacchi · BRUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFlexible intensive care unit (ICU) visiting hours have been proposed as a means to improve patient-centred and family-centred care. However, randomised trials evaluating the effects of flexible family visitation models (FFVMs) are scarce. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of an FFVM versus a restrictive family visitation model (RFVM) on delirium prevention among ICU patients, as well as to analyse its potential effects on family members and ICU professionals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cluster-randomised crossover trial involving adult ICU patients, family members and ICU professionals will be conducted. Forty medical-surgical Brazilian ICUs with RFVMs (<4.5 hours/day) will be randomly assigned to either an RFVM (visits according to local policies) or an FFVM (visitation during 12 consecutive hours per day) group at a 1:1 ratio. After enrolment and follow-up of 25 patients, each ICU will be switched over to the other visitation model, until 25 more patients per site are enrolled and followed. The primary outcome will be the cumulative incidence of delirium among ICU patients, measured twice a day using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. Secondary outcome measures will include daily hazard of delirium, ventilator-free days, any ICU-acquired infections, ICU length of stay and hospital mortality among the patients; symptoms of anxiety and depression and satisfaction among the family members; and prevalence of burnout symptoms among the ICU professionals. Tertiary outcomes will include need for antipsychotic agents and/or mechanical restraints, coma-free days, unplanned loss of invasive devices and ICU-acquired pneumonia, urinary tract infection or bloodstream infection among the patients; self-perception of involvement in patient care among the family members; and satisfaction among the ICU professionals. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the research ethics committee of all participant institutions. We aim to disseminate the findings through conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

trial registrationNCT02932358.

Indexed as

DeliriumFamily RelationsIntensive Care UnitsVisitors to PatientsAdultBrazilCross-Over StudiesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of Resultscritical caredeliriumfamilyhealth personnelintensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID29654049
PMCPMC5905750
OpenAlexW2796520678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.