Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29654038›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Efficacy of nurse-led and general practitioner-led comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: protocol of a pragmatic three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial (CEpiA study).

Emilie Ferrat, Sylvie Bastuji-Garin, Elena Paillaud, Philippe Caillet, Pascal Clerc, Laura Moscova, Amel Gouja, Vincent Renard, Claude Attali, Julien Le Breton and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02664454 (Compared Efficacy of Nurse-led and GP-led Geriatric Assessment in PrImary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02664454 nacompletednot on this map

Compared Efficacy of Nurse-led and GP-led Geriatric Assessment in PrImary Care: A Pragmatic Three-arm Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2016 to 2018Enrolled750ConditionsMultimorbidity, Geriatric AssessmentArmshealth care organization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multimorbidity.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emilie FerratUniversité Paris-EstCréteil (UPEC), DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology andAgeing Unit), Créteil, France.
Sylvie Bastuji-GarinUniversité Paris-EstCréteil (UPEC), DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology andAgeing Unit), Créteil, France.
Elena PaillaudUniversité Paris-EstCréteil (UPEC), DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology andAgeing Unit), Créteil, France.
Philippe CailletUniversité Paris-EstCréteil (UPEC), DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology andAgeing Unit), Créteil, France.
Pascal ClercUniversité Paris-EstCréteil (UPEC), DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology andAgeing Unit), Créteil, France.
Laura MoscovaUniversité Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), School ofMedicine, Primary Care Department, Créteil, France.
Amel GoujaAP-HP, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Clinical Research Unit(URC Mondor), Créteil, France.
Vincent RenardUniversité Paris-EstCréteil (UPEC), DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology andAgeing Unit), Créteil, France.
Claude AttaliUniversité Paris-EstCréteil (UPEC), DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology andAgeing Unit), Créteil, France.
Julien Le BretonUniversité Paris-EstCréteil (UPEC), DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology andAgeing Unit), Créteil, France.
Etienne AudureauUniversité Paris-EstCréteil (UPEC), DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology andAgeing Unit), Créteil, France.
Université Paris-Est Créteil · FRInstitut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOlder patients raise therapeutic challenges, because they constitute a heterogeneous population with multimorbidity. To appraise this complexity, geriatricians have developed a multidimensional comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), which may be difficult to apply in primary care settings. Our primary objective was to compare the effect on morbimortality of usual care compared with two complex interventions combining educational seminars about CGA: a dedicated geriatric hotline for general practitioners (GPs) and CGA by trained nurses or GPs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing study is an open-label, pragmatic, multicentre, three-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial comparing two intervention groups and one control group. Patients must be 70 years or older with a long-term illness or with unscheduled hospitalisation in the past 3 months (750 patients planned). This study involves volunteering GPs practising in French primary care centres, with randomisation at the practice level. The multifaceted interventions for interventional arms comprise an educational interactive multiprofessional seminar for GPs and nurses, a geriatric hotline dedicated to GPs in case of difficulties and the performance of a CGA updated to primary care. The CGA is systematically performed by a nurse in arm 1 but is GP-led on a case-by-case basis in arm 2. The primary endpoint is a composite criterion comprising overall death, unscheduled hospitalisations, emergency admissions and institutionalisation within 12 months after inclusion. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed using mixed-effects logistic regression models, with adjustment for potential confounders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by an appropriate ethics committee (CPP Ile-de-France IV, Paris, France, approval April 2015;15 664). This study is conducted according to principles of good clinical practice in the context of current care and will provide useful knowledge on the clinical benefits achievable by CGA in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02664454; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AgedChronic DiseaseClinical CompetenceClinical ProtocolsCluster AnalysisFranceGeneral PractitionersGeriatric AssessmentHospitalizationHotlinesHumansNursesPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomeclusterrandomisedtrialgeriatric assessmentpatient-centredapproachprimary care

Identifiers

PMID29654038
PMCPMC5898323
OpenAlexW2796768931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.