Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29653915›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. HIV2018

Effect of ready-to-use supplementary food on mortality in severely immunocompromised HIV-infected individuals in Africa initiating antiretroviral therapy (REALITY): an open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.

Jane Mallewa, Alexander J Szubert, Peter Mugyenyi, Ennie Chidziva, Margaret J Thomason, Priscilla Chepkorir, George Abongomera, Keith Baleeta, Anthony Etyang, Colin Warambwa and 15 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. HIV, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Jane MallewaDepartment/College of Medicine and Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Alexander J SzubertMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Peter MugyenyiJoint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala, Uganda.
Ennie ChidzivaUniversity of Zimbabwe Clinical Research Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Margaret J ThomasonMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Priscilla ChepkorirMoi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya.
George AbongomeraJoint Clinical Research Centre, Gulu, Uganda.
Keith BaleetaJoint Clinical Research Centre, Mbale, Uganda.
Anthony EtyangKEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Colin WarambwaUniversity of Zimbabwe Clinical Research Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Betty MellyMoi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya.
Shepherd MudzingwaUniversity of Zimbabwe Clinical Research Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Christine KellyDepartment/College of Medicine and Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Clara AgutuKEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Helen WilkesMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Sanele NkomaniUniversity of Zimbabwe Clinical Research Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Victor MusiimeJoint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala, Uganda.
Abbas LugemwaJoint Clinical Research Centre, Mbarara, Uganda.
Sarah L PettMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK; The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Mutsa Bwakura-DangarembiziUniversity of Zimbabwe Clinical Research Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Andrew J PrendergastQueen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Diana M GibbMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: diana.gibb@ucl.ac.uk.
A Sarah WalkerMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: rmjlasw@ucl.ac.uk.
James A BerkleyKEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
REALITY trial team

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_EX_G1100693Medical Research Council MC_EX_UU_G1100693Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/17Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/23Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/26Medical Research Council MR/M007367/1Medical Research Council MR/P022251/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn sub-Saharan Africa, severely immunocompromised HIV-infected individuals have a high risk of mortality during the first few months after starting antiretroviral therapy (ART). We hypothesise that universally providing ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF) would increase early weight gain, thereby reducing early mortality compared with current guidelines recommending ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) for severely malnourished individuals only.

methodsWe did a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial, open-label, parallel-group trial at inpatient and outpatient facilities in eight urban or periurban regional hospitals in Kenya, Malawi, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Eligible participants were ART-naive adults and children aged at least 5 years with confirmed HIV infection and a CD4 cell count of fewer than 100 cells per μL, who were initiating ART at the facilities. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to initiate ART either with (RUSF) or without (no-RUSF) 12 weeks' of peanut-based RUSF containing 1000 kcal per day and micronutrients, given as two 92 g packets per day for adults and one packet (500 kcal per day) for children aged 5-12 years, regardless of nutritional status. In both groups, individuals received supplementation with RUTF only when severely malnourished (ie, body-mass index [BMI] <16-18 kg/m

findingsBetween June 18, 2013, and April 10, 2015, we randomly assigned 1805 participants to treatment: 897 to RUSF and 908 to no-RUSF. 56 (3%) were lost-to-follow-up. 96 (10·9%, 95% CI 9·0-13·1) participants allocated to RUSF and 92 (10·3%, 8·5-12·5) to no-RUSF died within 24 weeks (hazard ratio 1·05, 95% CI 0·79-1·40; log-rank p=0·75), with no evidence of interaction with the other randomisations (both p>0·7). Through 48 weeks, adults and adolescents aged 13 years and older in the RUSF group had significantly greater gains in weight, BMI, and MUAC than the no-RUSF group (p=0·004, 0·004, and 0·03, respectively). The most common type of serious adverse event was specific infections, occurring in 90 (10%) of 897 participants assigned RUSF and 87 (10%) of 908 assigned no-RUSF. By week 48, 205 participants had serious adverse events in both groups (p=0·81), and 181 had grade 4 adverse events in the RUSF group compared with 172 in the non-RUSF group (p=0·45).

interpretationIn severely immunocompromised HIV-infected individuals, providing RUSF universally at ART initiation, compared with providing RUTF to severely malnourished individuals only, improved short-term weight gain but not mortality. A change in policy to provide nutritional supplementation to all severely immunocompromised HIV-infected individuals starting ART is therefore not warranted at present.

fundingJoint Global Health Trials Scheme (UK Medical Research Council, UK Department for International Development, and Wellcome Trust).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfrica South of the SaharaAgedAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsArachisBody Mass IndexBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolDiet TherapyFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsMicronutrientsRaltegravir Potassium

Identifiers

PMID29653915
PMCPMC5932190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.