Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29653770›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2018

A Comparative Study of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol Initiation and 1-Year Mortality Among Individuals Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Magdalene M Assimon, M Alan Brookhart, Jason P Fine, Gerardo Heiss, J Bradley Layton, Jennifer E Flythe

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Current Knowledge of Beta-Blockers in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magdalene M AssimonUniversity of North Carolina Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: massimon@live.unc.edu.
M Alan BrookhartDepartment of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jason P FineDepartment of Biostatistics, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
Gerardo HeissDepartment of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Bradley LaytonDepartment of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC; RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jennifer E FlytheUniversity of North Carolina Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

Funding

Investigating strategies to reduce fluid-related complications among hemodialysis patientsK23DK109401 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FLYTHE, JENNIFER E · 2016 to 2020
$992k
Investigating the longitudinal patterns of use and comparative effectiveness of beta blocker therapy in the hemodialysis populationF32DK109561 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ASSIMON, MAGDALENE MARIE · 2016 to 2016
$71k
NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK109561NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK109401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarvedilol and metoprolol are the β-blockers most commonly prescribed to US hemodialysis patients, accounting for ∼80% of β-blocker prescriptions. Despite well-established pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic differences between the 2 medications, little is known about their relative safety and efficacy in the hemodialysis population. STUDY

designA retrospective cohort study using a new-user design. SETTING &

participantsMedicare-enrolled hemodialysis patients treated at a large US dialysis organization who initiated carvedilol or metoprolol therapy from January 1, 2007, through December 30, 2012. PREDICTOR: Carvedilol versus metoprolol initiation. OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and intradialytic hypotension (systolic blood pressure decrease ≥ 20mmHg during hemodialysis plus intradialytic saline solution administration) during a 1-year follow-up period. MEASUREMENTS: Survival models were used to estimate HRs and 95% CIs in mortality analyses. Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% CIs in intradialytic hypotension analyses. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for several demographic, clinical, laboratory, and dialysis treatment covariates in all analyses.

results27,064 individuals receiving maintenance hemodialysis were included: 9,558 (35.3%) carvedilol initiators and 17,506 (64.7%) metoprolol initiators. Carvedilol (vs metoprolol) initiation was associated with greater all-cause (adjusted HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.16) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.29). In subgroup analyses, similar associations were observed among patients with hypertension, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and a recent myocardial infarction, the main cardiovascular indications for β-blocker therapy. During follow-up, carvedilol (vs metoprolol) initiators had a higher rate of intradialytic hypotension (adjusted IRR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11). LIMITATIONS: Residual confounding may exist.

conclusionsRelative to metoprolol initiation, carvedilol initiation was associated with higher 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. One potential mechanism for these findings may be the increased occurrence of intradialytic hypotension after carvedilol (vs metoprolol) initiation.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAgedCarvedilolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMetoprololMiddle AgedMortalityRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsCarvedilolMetoprololBeta-blockerblood pressurecardiovascularcarvediloldialyzabilityend-stage renal disease (ESRD)hemodialysishypotensionintradialytic hypotension (IDH)metoprololmortalitypharmacoepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID29653770
PMCPMC6477681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.