SynthesisThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2018
Progression from latent infection to active disease in dynamic tuberculosis transmission models: a systematic review of the validity of modelling assumptions.
Synthesis in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 90 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Agent-based modelling of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission: a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Mathematical models of drug-resistant tuberculosis lack bacterial heterogeneity: A systematic review.PLoS pathogens · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of biomarkers for differentiating active tuberculosis from latent tuberculosis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Economic and modeling evidence for tuberculosis preventive therapy among people living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2021Pooled it
- The prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection among healthcare workers in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.IJID regions · 2026Article
- Responding to a protracted tuberculosis outbreak: lessons from multiple rounds of investigation in a Chinese boarding school.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Modeling the Impact of Case Finding for Tuberculosis: The Role of Infection Dynamics.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Neutrophil-specific transcriptomic profiling reveals a novel signature for active tuberculosis diagnosis.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis cases loss to follow up before diagnosis and its associated factors in tertiary care institute.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Plasma protein biomarkers predictive of progression to active tuberculosis among close contacts of patients with tuberculosis.iScience · 2026Article
- Characterizing the tuberculosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus comorbidity in a South African cohort using untargeted GCxGC-TOFMS metabolomics.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Article
- Modelling tuberculosis transmission dynamics in Malaysia.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Using Imaris to rigorously track PET-defined sites of lung inflammation inAmerican journal of diagnostic imaging · 2026Article
- CD4Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Differential regulation of monocyte oxidative burst by isoniazid in healthy and latent tuberculosis-infected subjects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis manipulates LINC02528 in macrophages to modulate anti-tuberculosis metabolic immunity.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- The health impact of identifying a person with tuberculosis through systematic screening.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Prevalence and risk factors of latent tuberculosis infection in healthcare workers in Eastern China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of preventive treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection among key community-level populations.BMC medicine · 2025Article
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedCorrections.2018
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mathematical modelling is commonly used to evaluate infectious disease control policy and is influential in shaping policy and budgets. Mathematical models necessarily make assumptions about disease natural history and, if these assumptions are not valid, the results of these studies can be biased. We did a systematic review of published tuberculosis transmission models to assess the validity of assumptions about progression to active disease after initial infection (PROSPERO ID CRD42016030009). We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Biosis, and Cochrane Library, and included studies from the earliest available date (Jan 1, 1962) to Aug 31, 2017. We identified 312 studies that met inclusion criteria. Predicted tuberculosis incidence varied widely across studies for each risk factor investigated. For population groups with no individual risk factors, annual incidence varied by several orders of magnitude, and 20-year cumulative incidence ranged from close to 0% to 100%. A substantial proportion of modelled results were inconsistent with empirical evidence: for 10-year cumulative incidence, 40% of modelled results were more than double or less than half the empirical estimates. These results demonstrate substantial disagreement between modelling studies on a central feature of tuberculosis natural history. Greater attention to reproducing known features of epidemiology would strengthen future tuberculosis modelling studies, and readers of modelling studies are recommended to assess how well those studies demonstrate their validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.