ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2018
Meningeal carcinomatosis: three case-reports.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Characteristics of Patients with Meningeal Carcinomatosis Combined with Myelopathy.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeningeal carcinomatosis (MC) is characterized by diffuse infiltration of tumor cells in meninges. There is no tumor mass in the brain and parenchyma of the spinal cord. MC is divided into primary and metastatic types. MC cases were previously diagnosed postoperatively or at autopsy. Recent advances in spinal abbreviation cytology and imaging have led to increase in number of reported cases. In this study, we discuss the manifestations of MC patients based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, as well as the correlation between the manifestations and pathology. CASE PRESENTATION: MC was confirmed in all three cases by lumbar puncture and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Due to different primary diseases, the patients had specific imaging manifestations.
conclusionEnhanced MRI examination is extremely sensitive for detecting abnormalities in meninges, which plays a very important role in the diagnosis of MC. Since meninges of some MC patients cannot be enhanced, the enhanced MRI examination cannot be replaced by conventional cerebrospinal abbreviation examination. Attribute to the diversity of MR contrast agents, which could provide higher lesion conspicuity and enhances lesion detection, there may be some more choices to improve the detection rate of MC patients and prolong their survival lifetime.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.