Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29653535›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2018

Efficacy of shared decision-making on treatment adherence of patients with bipolar disorder: a cluster randomized trial (ShareD-BD).

L Samalin, M Honciuc, L Boyer, I de Chazeron, O Blanc, M Abbar, P M Llorca

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial ProtocolMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03245593 (Shared Medical Decision Making in the Prophylactic Treatment of Bipolar Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03245593 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Shared Medical Decision Making in the Prophylactic Treatment of Bipolar Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRan2018 to 2025Enrolled300ConditionsBipolar DisorderArmsShared-decision making process, standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [Long-acting antipsychotics: The QAAPAPLE algorithm review].Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

L SamalinCHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, EA7280, Clermont-Ferrand, France. lsamalin@chu-clermontferrand.fr.
M HonciucCHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, EA7280, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
L BoyerAix-Marseille University, Public Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life research Unit, EA 3279, Marseille, France.
I de ChazeronCHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, EA7280, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
O BlancCHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, EA7280, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
M AbbarCH Caremeau, Nîmes, France.
P M LlorcaCHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, EA7280, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared decision-making (SDM) is a model of interaction between doctors and patients in which both actors contribute to the medical decision-making process. SDM has raised great interest in mental healthcare over the last decade, as it is considered a fundamental part of patient-centered care. However, there is no research evaluating the efficacy of SDM compared to usual care (CAU), as it relates to quality of care and more specifically treatment adherence, in bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS/

designThis is a 12-month multi-centre, cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of SDM to CAU. Adult BD patients (n = 300) will be eligible after stabilization for at least 4 weeks following an acute mood episode. The intervention will consist of applying the standardized SDM process as developed by the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute in order to choose the maintenance treatment of BD. A multidisciplinary team developed a decision aid "choose my long-term treatment with my doctor" for BD patients to clarify possible therapeutic options. Primary outcome will assess the patient's level of adherence (based on hetero-evaluation) of ongoing treatment at 12 months. Secondary outcomes will assess the difference between the 2 groups of patients in terms of adherence to maintenance drug therapy based on other measures (self-assessment scale and plasma levels of mood stabilizers). Additionally, other dimensions will be assessed: decisional conflict, satisfaction with care and involvement in decision making, beliefs about treatment, therapeutic relationship, knowledge about information for medical decision and clinical outcomes (depression, mania, functioning and quality of life). The primary endpoint will be analysed without adjustment by comparison of adherence scores between the two groups using Student t-tests or Mann-Whitney tests according to the variable distribution. A set of secondary analyses will be adjusted for covariates of clinical interest using generalized linear mixed regression models. DISCUSSION: This will be the first study evaluating the effect of an SDM intervention on patient adherence in BD. This is also an innovative protocol because it proposes the development of an evidence-based tool that should help patients and clinicians to initiate discussions regarding the use of BD treatment.

trial registrationThe study has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03245593 .

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient ParticipationAdultBipolar DisorderClinical Decision-MakingDecision Support TechniquesHumansPatient-Centered CarePatient ComplianceQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBipolar disorderCluster randomized trialDecision aidMaintenance treatmentMedication adherenceShared decision-makingStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID29653535
PMCPMC5899333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.