Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29653534›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2018

A phylogenomic framework and timescale for comparative studies of tunicates.

Frédéric Delsuc, Hervé Philippe, Georgia Tsagkogeorga, Paul Simion, Marie-Ka Tilak, Xavier Turon, Susanna López-Legentil, Jacques Piette, Patrick Lemaire, Emmanuel J P Douzery

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic Distortion of Jawed Vertebrate Phylogeny.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Immune cell type divergence in a basal chordate.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Frédéric DelsucISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France. Frederic.Delsuc@umontpellier.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-6501-6287
Hervé PhilippeCentre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, UMR CNRS 5321, Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, Moulis, France.
Georgia TsagkogeorgaISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Paul SimionISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Marie-Ka TilakISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Xavier TuronCenter for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB, CSIC), Girona, Spain.
Susanna López-LegentilDepartment of Biology and Marine Biology, Center for Marine Science, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
Jacques PietteCentre de Recherche en Biologie cellulaire de Montpellier, UMR 5237, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Patrick LemaireCentre de Recherche en Biologie cellulaire de Montpellier, UMR 5237, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Emmanuel J P DouzeryISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes · ESUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTunicates are the closest relatives of vertebrates and are widely used as models to study the evolutionary developmental biology of chordates. Their phylogeny, however, remains poorly understood, and to date, only the 18S rRNA nuclear gene and mitogenomes have been used to delineate the major groups of tunicates. To resolve their evolutionary relationships and provide a first estimate of their divergence times, we used a transcriptomic approach to build a phylogenomic dataset including all major tunicate lineages, consisting of 258 evolutionarily conserved orthologous genes from representative species.

resultsPhylogenetic analyses using site-heterogeneous CAT mixture models of amino acid sequence evolution resulted in a strongly supported tree topology resolving the relationships among four major tunicate clades: (1) Appendicularia, (2) Thaliacea + Phlebobranchia + Aplousobranchia, (3) Molgulidae, and (4) Styelidae + Pyuridae. Notably, the morphologically derived Thaliacea are confirmed as the sister group of the clade uniting Phlebobranchia + Aplousobranchia within which the precise position of the model ascidian genus Ciona remains uncertain. Relaxed molecular clock analyses accommodating the accelerated evolutionary rate of tunicates reveal ancient diversification (~ 450-350 million years ago) among the major groups and allow one to compare their evolutionary age with respect to the major vertebrate model lineages.

conclusionsOur study represents the most comprehensive phylogenomic dataset for the main tunicate lineages. It offers a reference phylogenetic framework and first tentative timescale for tunicates, allowing a direct comparison with vertebrate model species in comparative genomics and evolutionary developmental biology studies.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAnimalsGenomicsRNA, Ribosomal, 18STranscriptomeUrochordataRNA, Ribosomal, 18SEvo-devoMolecular datingPhylogenomicsThaliaceaTranscriptomesTunicata

Identifiers

PMID29653534
PMCPMC5899321
OpenAlexW2782373699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.