Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29653297›Full record

Trial reportClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2018

The efficacy of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on mood may depend on individual differences including age and trait mood.

Carys Evans, Michael J Banissy, Rebecca A Charlton

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carys EvansDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK.
Michael J BanissyDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK.
Rebecca A CharltonDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK. Electronic address: r.charlton@gold.ac.uk.
Goldsmiths University of London · GB

Funding

The Dunhill Medical Trust R361/0514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess whether changes in brain microstructures associated with ageing and presence of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) reduce the efficacy of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) improving mood in euthymic older adults.

methodsUsing excitatory high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) over bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the effect on mood was assessed in euthymic young adults (YA), older adults (HOA) and older adults with CVRF (OVR). Active-tRNS or sham was applied over two sessions. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule and Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale measured self-reported state mood before and after stimulation. Trait mood was also measured using the Geriatric Depression Scale.

resultsResponse to tRNS seemed dependent on individual differences in age and trait mood. In HOA, more negative trait mood was associated with more positive mood change after tRNS. OVR showed a similar but reduced pattern of mood change to HOA. In YA, more positive trait mood was associated with greater positive mood change after tRNS.

conclusionsAge and trait mood may be important factors when examining the efficacy of tES as an alternative treatment for depression. SIGNIFICANCE: Future studies should consider how response to tES is affected by individual differences.

Indexed as

IndividualityTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultAffectAgedAge FactorsBrainDouble-Blind MethodHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAgingBrain stimulationCardiovascular riskDepressionTranscranial random noise stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29653297
PMCPMC5953277
OpenAlexW2795134910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.