Trial reportPloS one2018
Immunogenicity and safety of three consecutive production lots of the non replicating smallpox vaccine MVA: A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled phase III trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01144637 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial to Evaluate Immunogenicity and Safety of Three Consecutive Production Lots of IMVAMUNE®), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial to Evaluate Immunogenicity and Safety of Three Consecutive Production Lots of IMVAMUNE® (MVA-BN®) Smallpox Vaccine in Healthy, Vaccinia-Naïve Subjects
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal and Pediatric Use of Vaccines for Mpox: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Safety and Effectiveness.Drug safety · 2026Pooled it
- Predicting vaccine effectiveness for mpox.Nature communications · 2024Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Post-Eradication Smallpox Vaccine as an Mpox Vaccine: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Equivalence of freeze-dried and liquid-frozen formulations of MVA-BN as smallpox and mpox vaccine.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Trial
- Reduced Respiratory Syncytial Virus Load, Symptoms, and Infections: A Human Challenge Trial of MVA-BN-RSV Vaccine.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2023Trial
- One- and Two-Dose Vaccinations With Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic Induce Durable B-Cell Memory Responses Comparable to Replicating Smallpox Vaccines.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2023Trial
- Article
- Antibody Responses are Sustained 2 Years Post-Mpox Infection but not Following Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic Vaccination.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Immune Response to MVA-BN Vaccination for Mpox: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Multivalent mpox protein nanoparticle vaccines confer cross-protection against orthopoxvirus infection.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- An Mpox Multi-Antigen-Tandem Bivalent mRNA Candidate Vaccine Effectively Protects Mice Against the Vaccinia Virus.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a quantitative Orthopoxvirus immunoassay to evaluate and differentiate serological responses to Mpox infection and vaccination.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- Stigmatization and Preferences in Monkeypox Vaccine Regimens.Archives of sexual behavior · 2024Article
- Biological Characteristics and Pathogenesis of Monkeypox Virus: An Overview.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Managing Monkeypox Virus Infections: A Contemporary Review.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2024Review
- Quantitative proteomics defines mechanisms of antiviral defence and cell death during modified vaccinia Ankara infection.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Monkeypox as a warning to preserve global herd immunities.Virulence · 2023Article
- A Review of the Past, Present, and Future of the Monkeypox Virus: Challenges, Opportunities, and Lessons from COVID-19 for Global Health Security.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) is a live, viral vaccine under advanced development as a non-replicating smallpox vaccine. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial was conducted to demonstrate the humoral immunogenic equivalence of three consecutively manufactured MVA production lots, and to confirm the safety and tolerability of MVA focusing on cardiac readouts.
methodsThe trial was conducted at 34 sites in the US. Vaccinia-naïve adults aged 18-40 years were randomly allocated to one of four groups using a 1:1:1:1 randomization scheme. Subjects received either two MVA injections from three consecutive lots (Groups 1-3), or two placebo injections (Group 4), four weeks apart. Everyone except personnel involved in vaccine handling and administration was blinded to treatment. Safety assessment focused on cardiac monitoring throughout the trial. Vaccinia-specific antibody titers were measured using a Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT) and an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The primary immunogenicity endpoint was Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) after two MVA vaccinations measured by PRNT at trial visit 4. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01144637.
resultsBetween March 2013 and May 2014, 4005 subjects were enrolled and received at least one injection of MVA (n = 3003) or placebo (n = 1002). The three MVA lots induced equivalent antibody titers two weeks after the second vaccination, with seroconversion rates of 99·8% (PRNT) and 99·7% (ELISA). Overall, 180 (6·0%) subjects receiving MVA and 29 (2·9%) subjects in the placebo group reported at least one unsolicited Adverse Event (AE) that was considered trial-related. Vaccination was well tolerated without significant safety concerns, particularly regarding cardiac assessment.
conclusionsThe neutralizing and total antibody titers induced by each of the three lots were equivalent. No significant safety concerns emerged in this healthy trial population, especially regarding cardiac safety, thus confirming the excellent safety and tolerability profile of MVA.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01144637.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.