Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29652887›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Ethnicity matching and outcomes after kidney transplantation in the United Kingdom.

Bhavini Pisavadia, Adam Arshad, Imogen Chappelow, Peter Nightingale, Benjamin Anderson, Jay Nath, Adnan Sharif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of Asian and Black Donor and Recipient Ethnicity on the Outcomes After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in the United Kingdom.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Deceased-Donor Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Cohort.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deceased Donor Characteristics and Kidney Transplant Outcomes.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Review
  9. Racial Difference in the Association of Long-Term Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter (PMInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bhavini PisavadiaDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Adam ArshadUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Imogen ChappelowUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Peter NightingaleDepartment of Medical Statistics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Benjamin AndersonDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Jay NathSchool of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Adnan SharifUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7586-9136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKidneys from non-white donors have inferior outcomes, but it is unclear if ethnicity matching between donors and recipients achieves better post kidney transplant outcomes.

methodsWe undertook a retrospective, population cohort study utilising UK Transplant Registry data. The cohort comprised adult, kidney-alone, transplant recipients receiving their first kidney transplant between 2003-2015, with data censored at 1st October 2016. We included 27,970 recipients stratified into white (n = 23,215), black (n = 1,679) and south Asian (n = 3,076) ethnicity, with median post-transplant follow-up of 1,676 days (IQR 716-2,869 days). Unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression survival analyses were performed to investigate ethnicity effect on risk for graft loss and mortality.

resultsIn unadjusted analyses, matched ethnicity between donors-recipients resulted in better outcomes for delayed graft function, one-year creatinine, graft and patient survival but these differed by ethnicity matches. Compared to white-to-white transplants, risk for death-censored graft loss was higher in black-to-black and similar among Asian-to-Asian transplants, but mortality risk was lower for both black-to-black and Asian-to-Asian transplants. In Cox regression models, compared to white donors, we observed higher risk for graft loss with both south Asian (HR 1.38, 95%CI 1.12-1.70, p = 0.003) and black (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.30-2.11, p<0.001) donated kidneys independent of recipient ethnicity. We observed no mortality difference with south Asian donated kidneys but increased mortality with black donated kidneys (HR 1.68, 95%CI 1.21-2.35, p = 0.002). Matching ethnicities made no significant difference in any Cox regression model. Similar results were observed after stratifying our analysis by living and deceased-donor kidney transplantation.

conclusionsOur data confirm inferior outcomes associated with non-white kidney donors for kidney transplant recipients of any ethnicity in a risk-adjusted model for the United Kingdom population. However, contrary to non-renal transplant literature, we did not identify any survival benefits associated with donor-recipient ethnicity matching.

Indexed as

EthnicityHistocompatibility TestingKidney TransplantationAdultFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiving DonorsMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareSurvival AnalysisUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID29652887
PMCPMC5898720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.