Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29652790›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Silicon and Mechanisms of Plant Resistance to Insect Pests.

Fadi Alhousari, Maria Greger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Soil CaPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Foliar Application ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fadi AlhousariDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Science, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden. fadi.alhousari@su.se.
Maria GregerDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Science, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden. maria.greger@su.se.ORCID 0000-0002-1294-2615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reviews the most recent progress in exploring silicon-mediated resistance to herbivorous insects and the mechanisms involved. The aim is to determine whether any mechanism seems more common than the others as well as whether the mechanisms are more pronounced in silicon-accumulating than non-silicon-accumulating species or in monocots than eudicots. Two types of mechanisms counter insect pest attacks: physical or mechanical barriers and biochemical/molecular mechanisms (in which Si can upregulate and prime plant defence pathways against insects). Although most studies have examined high Si accumulators, both accumulators and non-accumulators of silicon as well as monocots and eudicots display similar Si defence mechanisms against insects.

Indexed as

HIPVsinduced defenceinsectsphysical defenceplant resistancesilicon

Identifiers

PMID29652790
PMCPMC6027389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.