Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29652270›Full record

ReviewAnnals of cardiac anaesthesia

Pulmonary hypertension and cardiac anesthesia: Anesthesiologist's perspective.

Manjula Sudeep Sarkar, Pushkar M Desai

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of cardiac anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The perioperative use of inhaled prostacyclins in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Novel inhaled pulmonary vasodilators in adult cardiac surgery: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Article
  9. Perioperative management of the vulnerable and failing right ventricle.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Perioperative Management of Pulmonary Hypertension. a Review.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manjula Sudeep SarkarDepartment of Anesthesiology, Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Pushkar M DesaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perioperative management of pulmonary hypertension remains one of the most challenging scenarios during cardiac surgery. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality due to right ventricular failure, arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, and intractable hypoxia. Therefore, this review article is intended toward the anesthetic considerations in the perioperative period, with particular emphasis on the selection of technique and choice of anesthesia with maintenance, anesthetic drugs, and the recent intraoperative recommendations for prevention and treatment of pulmonary hypertensive crisis.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnesthesiologistsAdultCardiac Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHypertension, PulmonaryMalePerioperative CarePregnancyAnesthesiapulmonary hypertensionpulmonary hypertension crisis

Identifiers

PMID29652270
PMCPMC5914209
OpenAlexW2797675057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.