Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29652247›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Motor selection dynamics in FEF explain the reaction time variance of saccades to single targets.

Christopher K Hauser, Dantong Zhu, Terrence R Stanford, Emilio Salinas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Working Memory of Multi-Object Scenes in Primate Frontal Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Neural Substrates of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Brain Disorders.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. The Neural Basis for Response Latency in a Sensory-Motor Behavior.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher K HauserDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States.
Dantong ZhuDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States.
Terrence R StanfordDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States.
Emilio SalinasDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-5693

Funding

CRCNS: investigating perceptual processing speed and its impact on choice behaviorR01EY025172 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SALINAS, EMILIO, STANFORD, TERRENCE R · 2016 to 2024
$3.6M
DIENCEPHALIC MECHANISMS OF VISUOMOTOR INTEGRATIONR01EY012389 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STANFORD, TERRENCE R · 1999 to 2009
$2.5M
Training in Emerging Multidisciplinary Approaches to Mental Health and DiseaseT32MH020065 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI NICOLAE, DAN LIVIU, RZHETSKY, ANDREY · 2002 to 2017
$2.3M
Midbrain Mechanisms of Sensory-Guided Oculomotor ChoiceR01EY021228 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SALINAS, EMILIO, STANFORD, TERRENCE R · 2014 to 2017
$1.8M
Training Program in Multisensory ProcessesT32NS073553 · NINDS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STEIN, BARRY E · 2011 to 2020
$1.7M
CRCNS:Investigating perceptual processing speed and its impact on choice behaviorR01DA030750 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SALINAS, EMILIO, STANFORD, TERRENCE R · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012389NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021228NEI NIH HHS R01EY021228NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025172NEI NIH HHS R01EY12389NEI NIH HHS R01EY12389-S1NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030750NIDA NIH HHS R01DA030750NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020065NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS073553NINDS NIH HHS Training grant T32NS073553-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In studies of voluntary movement, a most elemental quantity is the reaction time (RT) between the onset of a visual stimulus and a saccade toward it. However, this RT demonstrates extremely high variability which, in spite of extensive research, remains unexplained. It is well established that, when a visual target appears, oculomotor activity gradually builds up until a critical level is reached, at which point a saccade is triggered. Here, based on computational work and single-neuron recordings from monkey frontal eye field (FEF), we show that this rise-to-threshold process starts from a dynamic initial state that already contains other incipient, internally driven motor plans, which compete with the target-driven activity to varying degrees. The ensuing conflict resolution process, which manifests in subtle covariations between baseline activity, build-up rate, and threshold, consists of fundamentally deterministic interactions, and explains the observed RT distributions while invoking only a small amount of intrinsic randomness.

Indexed as

Reaction TimeAnimalsEye MovementsFrontal LobeMacaca mulattaMaleSaccadesVisual Pathwaysattentiondecision makingfrontal eye fieldmonkeyneurosciencerewardrhesus macaquesaccadic eye movements

Identifiers

PMID29652247
PMCPMC5947991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.