Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29652215›Full record

SynthesisIssues in mental health nursing2018

Stigma of Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review.

Dominique Bulgin, Paula Tanabe, Coretta Jenerette

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Issues in mental health nursing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Non-Communicable Diseases-Related Stigma: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Humanistic and economic burden among caregivers of adults and children with sickle cell disease and recurrent vaso-occlusive crises.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dominique Bulgina Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Paula Tanabea Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Coretta Jeneretteb University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Understanding the Intersection of Stigma and Self-Management in Sickle Cell DiseaseF31NR017344 · NINR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BULGIN, DOMINIQUE C · 2017 to 2018
$79k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR017344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the literature regarding health-related stigma in adolescents and adults living with sickle cell disease (SCD). Four domains were identified from 27 studies: (1) social consequences of stigma; (2) the effect of stigma on psychological well-being; (3) the effect of stigma on physiological well-being; and (4) the impact of stigma on patient-provider relationships and care-seeking behaviors. Current literature revealed that SCD stigma has detrimental consequences. Methodological issues as well as research and practice implications were identified. Future research should further examine the impact of health-related stigma on self-management of SCD.

Indexed as

Social StigmaAdolescentAdultAnemia, Sickle CellHumansYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29652215
PMCPMC6186193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.