Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29652127›Full record

ReviewAccounts of chemical research2018

Optical Probes for Neurobiological Sensing and Imaging.

Eric H Kim, Gregory Chin, Guoxin Rong, Kira E Poskanzer, Heather A Clark

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Accounts of chemical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Programmable Catalytic Core of 8-17 DNAzymes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Expanding the Genetic Code for Neuronal Studies.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. MoSScience advances · 2019
    Article
  19. Neurotransmitter-Responsive Nanosensors forJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory ChinDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience , University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco , California 94143 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7805-7240
Kira E PoskanzerDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience , University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco , California 94143 , United States.
Northeastern University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

A Functional Taxonomy of Cortical AstrocytesR01NS099254 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Evan Harriman Feinberg · 2017 to 2026
$4.1M
Optical Nanosensors Detect Neurotransmitter Release in the Peripheral Nervous SystemOT2OD024909 · OD · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MONAGHAN, JAMES R · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
Polymer-Free Nanosensors To Visualize Biochemical Dynamics in Dendritic SpinesR01NS081641 · NINDS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, HEATHER A · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NIH HHS OT2 OD024909NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081641NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescent nanosensors and molecular probes are next-generation tools for imaging chemical signaling inside and between cells. Electrophysiology has long been considered the gold standard in elucidating neural dynamics with high temporal resolution and precision, particularly on the single-cell level. However, electrode-based techniques face challenges in illuminating the specific chemicals involved in neural cell activation with adequate spatial information. Measuring chemical dynamics is of fundamental importance to better understand synergistic interactions between neurons as well as interactions between neurons and non-neuronal cells. Over the past decade, significant technological advances in optical probes and imaging methods have enabled entirely new possibilities for studying neural cells and circuits at the chemical level. These optical imaging modalities have shown promise for combining chemical, temporal, and spatial information. This potential makes them ideal candidates to unravel the complex neural interactions at multiple scales in the brain, which could be complemented by traditional electrophysiological methods to obtain a full spatiotemporal picture of neurochemical dynamics. Despite the potential, only a handful of probe candidates have been utilized to provide detailed chemical information in the brain. To date, most live imaging and chemical mapping studies rely on fluorescent molecular indicators to report intracellular calcium (Ca

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesCell Line, TumorDopamineFluorescent DyesHumansLuminescent ProteinsMolecular ProbesNeuronsOptical ImagingQuantum DotsVisual CortexDopamineFluorescent DyesLuminescent ProteinsMolecular Probes

Identifiers

PMID29652127
PMCPMC6128814
OpenAlexW2797292481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.