Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29652026›Full record

Trial reportSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association

Preoperative biliary drainage using a fully covered self-expandable metallic stent for pancreatic head cancer: A prospective feasibility study.

Osamu Togawa, Hiroyuki Isayama, Hiroshi Kawakami, Yousuke Nakai, Dai Mohri, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Hirofumi Kogure, Kazumichi Kawakubo, Naoya Sakamoto, Kazuhiko Koike and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic head cancer patients.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Osamu TogawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanto Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Tokyo; Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroyuki IsayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo; Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi KawakamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Yousuke NakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Dai MohriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsuyoshi HamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi KogureDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazumichi KawakuboDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Naoya SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Kazuhiko KoikeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroto KitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama; Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPHokkaido University · JPJuntendo University · JPSaitama International Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: The role of endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) for pancreatic head cancer is controversial because of the high incidence of stent occlusion before surgery. This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of PBD using a fully covered self-expandable metallic stent (FCSEMS). Patients and Methods: This multicenter prospective study involved 26 patients treated for pancreatic head cancer with distal bile duct obstruction from April 2011 to March 2013. An FCSEMS was endoscopically placed in 24 patients. Among these, 7 patients were diagnosed with unresectable cancer, and 17 underwent surgery at a median of 18 days after FCSEMS placement. The main outcome measure was preoperative and postoperative adverse events. Results: Two adverse events (cholecystitis and insufficient resolution of jaundice) occurred between FCSEMS placement and surgery (12%). Postoperative adverse events occurred in eight patients (47%). The cumulative incidence of stent-related adverse events 4 and 8 weeks after FCSEMS placement among the 24 patients who underwent this procedure were 19%. Conclusions: PBD using an FCSEMS is feasible in patients with resectable pancreatic head cancer. Placement of an FCSEMS can be an alternative PBD technique when surgery without delay is impossible. A larger randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Indexed as

AgedBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresCholestasisDrainageFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsPreoperative CareProspective StudiesSelf Expandable Metallic StentsTreatment OutcomePancreatic cancerpreoperative biliary drainageself-expandable metallic stent

Identifiers

PMID29652026
PMCPMC5985633
OpenAlexW2797832202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.