ArticleEuropean radiology2018
Radiation burden and associated cancer risk for a typical population to be screened for lung cancer with low-dose CT: A phantom study.
Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lung cancer screening in limited resource regions: the 3rd Brazilian Early Lung Cancer Trial (BRELT3/mobile ProPulmão).Lung cancer management · 2025Article
- Cost effectiveness analysis of low dose computed tomography lung cancer screening in Chinese population.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recurrent medical imaging exposures for the care of patients: one way forward.European radiology · 2024Review
- Evaluation of an in-use chest CT protocol in lung cancer screening - A single institutional study.Acta radiologica open · 2024Article
- Detection, measurement, and diagnosis of lung nodules by ultra-low-dose CT in lung cancer screening: a systematic review.BJR open · 2024Article
- Radiation Exposure to Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening: Should We Be Concerned?Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- Combined measurement of circulating tumor cell counts and serum tumor marker levels enhances the screening efficiency for malignant versus benign pulmonary nodules.Thoracic cancer · 2022Article
- Single CT Appointment for Double Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Is the Time Ripe?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cost-effectiveness and health impact of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography for never smokers in Japan and the United States: a modelling study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Article
- Latest CT technologies in lung cancer screening: protocols and radiation dose reduction.Translational lung cancer research · 2021Review
- Cost-Efficient Early Diagnostic Tool for Lung Cancer: Explainable AI in Clinical Systems.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Image Quality and Pulmonary Nodule Detectability at Low-dose Computed Tomography (low kVp and mAs): A phantom study.Journal of medical signals and sensorsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo estimate (a) organ doses and organ-specific radiation-induced cancer risk from a single low-dose CT (LDCT) for lung cancer screening (LCS) and (b) the theoretical cumulative risk of radiation-induced cancer for a typical cohort to be subjected to repeated annual LCS LDCT.
methodsSex- and body size-specific organ dose data from scan projection radiography (SPR) and helical CT exposures involved in LCS 256-slice LDCT were determined using Monte Carlo methods. Theoretical life attributable risk (LAR) of radiogenic cancer from a single 256-slice chest LDCT at age 55-80 years and the cumulative LAR of cancer from repeated annual LDCT studies up to age 80 years were estimated and compared to corresponding nominal lifetime intrinsic risks (LIRs) of being diagnosed with cancer.
resultsThe effective dose from LCS 256-slice LDCT was estimated to be 0.71 mSv. SPR was found to contribute 6-12 % to the total effective dose from chest LDCT. The radiation-cancer LAR from a single LDCT study was found to increase the nominal LIR of cancer in average-size 55-year-old males and females by 0.008 % and 0.018 %, respectively. Cumulative radiogenic risk of cancer from repeated annual scans from the age of 55-80 years was found to increase the nominal LIR of cancer by 0.13 % in males and 0.30 % in females.
conclusionModern scanners may offer sub-millisievert LCS LDCT. Cumulative radiation risk from repeated annual 256-slice LDCT LCS examinations was found to minimally aggravate the lifetime intrinsic cancer risk of a typical screening population. KEY POINTS: • Effective dose from lung cancer screening low-dose CT may be <1 mSv. • Screening with modern low-dose CT minimally aggravates lifetime cancer induction intrinsic risk. • Dosimetry of lung cancer screening low-dose CT should encounter the radiation burden from the localizing scan projection radiography. • DLP method may underestimate effective dose from low-dose chest CT by 27 %.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.