ReviewDrugs & aging2018
Abatacept for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Special Focus on the Elderly.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abatacept, Golimumab, and Sarilumab as Selected Bio-Originator Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs with Diverse Mechanisms of Action in Their Current Use in Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Abatacept is Efficacious in the Treatment of Older Patients with csDMARD-Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.Rheumatology and therapy · 2021Article
- Impact of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted therapies have been developed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for whom prior treatment with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs has failed. The numerous different signaling pathways now targeted by various classes of monoclonal antibodies and small molecule inhibitors may complicate treatment decisions. Abatacept selectively modulates a co-stimulatory signal necessary for T-cell activation. Thus, abatacept is effective in biologic-naive patients and in those for whom biologic therapy has failed. Emerging evidence indicates different benefits depending on patient and disease characteristics. In RA, the clinical goal should be clinical and radiographic remission to prevent structural damage and functional impairment. Nevertheless, the management of elderly patients with RA is often less aggressive, and the treat-to-target strategy is less respected in this age category than in the treatment of RA in younger patients. However, abatacept treatment in elderly patients is as effective and well-tolerated as in younger patients. This review summarizes recently published data on pharmacological properties; clinical and biological data on efficacy, drug retention, and safety, focusing on age; and evidence-based criteria for choosing abatacept or an alternative targeted therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.