Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29651610›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2018

Periprosthetic femoral fracture as cause of early revision after short stem hip arthroplasty-a multicentric analysis.

Sang-Min Kim, Seung-Beom Han, Kee Hyung Rhyu, Jeong Joon Yoo, Kwang-Jun Oh, Je Hyun Yoo, Kyung-Jae Lee, Seung-Jae Lim

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Periprosthetic fracture following arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: is a cemented stem protective?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Sang-Min KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung-Beom HanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Anam Hospital, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Kee Hyung RhyuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung-Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
Jeong Joon YooDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Kwang-Jun OhDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Je Hyun YooDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart hospital, Anyang, South Korea.
Kyung-Jae LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Seung-Jae LimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, South Korea. limsj70@gmail.com.
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRKeimyung University Dongsan Medical Center · KRKonkuk University Medical Center · KRKorea University · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRKyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to analyze the prevalence and causes of early re-operation after hip replacement surgery using short bone-preserving stems in a large multicentre series. Specifically, we evaluated the clinical features of periprosthetic fractures occurring around short stems.

methodsA total of 897 patients (1089 hips) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty or bipolar hemiarthroplasty from January 2011 to February 2015 using short bone-preserving femoral stems were recruited. Mean patient age was 57.4 years (range, 18-97 years), with a male ratio of 49.7% (541/1089). Re-operation for any reason within two years was used as an endpoint. The incidence and clinical characteristics of the periprosthetic femoral fractures were also recorded. Mean follow-up period was 5.1 years (range, 2-7.9 years).

resultsEarly re-operation for any reason was identified in 16 (1.5%) of 1089 hips. The main reason for re-operation was periprosthetic femoral fracture, which accounted for eight (50%) of the 16 re-operations. The overall incidence of periprosthetic femoral fracture at two years was 1.1% (12/1089). According to the Vancouver classification, two fractures were AG type and the other ten were B1 type. Advanced age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologist grade, femur morphology of Dorr type C, and the use of a calcar-loading stem increased the risk for periprosthetic femoral fracture.

conclusionPeriprosthetic femoral fracture was the major reason for re-operation after hip replacement surgery using short bone-preserving stems accounting for 50% (8/16) of re-operations two years post-operatively, but did not seem to deteriorate survivorship of implanted prostheses.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipCohort StudiesFemaleFemoral FracturesFemurHip ProsthesisHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPeriprosthetic FracturesReoperationHip replacementPeriprosthetic femoral fractureReoperationShort stem

Identifiers

PMID29651610
OpenAlexW2796997603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.