Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29651582›Full record

ArticleBiological cybernetics2018

Methods for identification of spike patterns in massively parallel spike trains.

Pietro Quaglio, Vahid Rostami, Emiliano Torre, Sonja Grün

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological cybernetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Statistical neuroscience in the single trial limit.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Point process models for sequence detection in high-dimensional neural spike trains.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2020
    Article
  15. On the methods for reactivation and replay analysis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pietro QuaglioInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), JARA Institute Brain Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany. p.quaglio@fz-juelich.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8012-3056
Vahid RostamiComputational Systems Neuroscience, Institute for Zoology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Emiliano TorreChair of Risk, Safety and Uncertainty Quantification, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sonja GrünInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), JARA Institute Brain Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporally, precise correlations between simultaneously recorded neurons have been interpreted as signatures of cell assemblies, i.e., groups of neurons that form processing units. Evidence for this hypothesis was found on the level of pairwise correlations in simultaneous recordings of few neurons. Increasing the number of simultaneously recorded neurons increases the chances to detect cell assembly activity due to the larger sample size. Recent technological advances have enabled the recording of 100 or more neurons in parallel. However, these massively parallel spike train data require novel statistical tools to be analyzed for correlations, because they raise considerable combinatorial and multiple testing issues. Recently, various of such methods have started to develop. First approaches were based on population or pairwise measures of synchronization, and later led to methods for the detection of various types of higher-order synchronization and of spatio-temporal patterns. The latest techniques combine data mining with analysis of statistical significance. Here, we give a comparative overview of these methods, of their assumptions and of the types of correlations they can detect.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsHumansMonte Carlo MethodNerve NetNeuronsCorrelated point processesData miningMonte Carlo methodsSpatio-temporal spike patternsSpike synchrony

Identifiers

PMID29651582
PMCPMC5908877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.