Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29651534›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2019

The unimanual handle-to-hand correspondence effect: evidence for a location coding account.

Antonello Pellicano, Luisa Lugli, Ferdinand Binkofski, Sandro Rubichi, Cristina Iani, Roberto Nicoletti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tool heads prime saccades.Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. On the Temporal Dynamics of Tool Use.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Antonello PellicanoDivision for Clinical and Cognitive Sciences, Department of Neurology Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 17, 52074, Aachen, Germany. apellicano@ukaachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1517-1323
Luisa LugliDepartment of Philosophy and Communication, University of Bologna, Via Azzo Gardino 23, 40122, Bologna, Italy.
Ferdinand BinkofskiDivision for Clinical and Cognitive Sciences, Department of Neurology Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 17, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Sandro RubichiDepartment of Education and Human Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Viale Antonio Allegri, 9, 42121, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Cristina IaniDepartment of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Viale Antonio Allegri, 9, 42121, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Roberto NicolettiDepartment of Philosophy and Communication, University of Bologna, Via Azzo Gardino 23, 40122, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

START Programme der Medizinischen Fakultät der RWTHAachen START Projekt 691240, 144/12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The handle-to-hand correspondence effect refers to faster and more accurate responses when the responding hand is aligned with the graspable part of an object tool, compared to when they lay on opposite sides. We performed four behavioral experiments to investigate whether this effect depends on the activation of grasping affordances (affordance activation account) or is to be traced back to a Simon effect, resulting from the spatial coding of stimuli and responses and from their dimensional overlap (location coding account). We manipulated the availability of a response alternative by requiring participants to perform either a unimanual go/no-go task (absence of a response alternative) or a joint go/no-go task (available response alternative) and the type of response required (button-press or grasping response). We found no handle-to-hand correspondence effect in the individual go/no-go task either when a button-press (Experiment 1A) or a grasping (Experiment 2A) response was required, whereas a significant effect emerged in the joint go/no-go task, irrespective of response modality (Experiments1B and 2B). These results do not support the idea that complex motor affordances are activated for meaningful objects, but are rather consistent with the more parsimonious location coding account.

Indexed as

CuesFemaleHandHand StrengthHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeSpace PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.