Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29651454›Full record

ArticleScience advances2018

Multiple episodes of extensive marine anoxia linked to global warming and continental weathering following the latest Permian mass extinction.

Feifei Zhang, Stephen J Romaniello, Thomas J Algeo, Kimberly V Lau, Matthew E Clapham, Sylvain Richoz, Achim D Herrmann, Harrison Smith, Micha Horacek, Ariel D Anbar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
46.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 218 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Repeated occurrences of marine anoxia under high atmospheric OProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Marine anoxia linked to abrupt global warming during Earth's penultimate icehouse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Feifei ZhangSchool of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-6004, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3277-445X
Stephen J RomanielloSchool of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-6004, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1582-6801
Thomas J AlgeoDepartment of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0013, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3333-7035
Kimberly V LauDeparment of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2273-8319
Matthew E ClaphamDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4867-7304
Sylvain RichozInstitute of Earth Sciences, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, Heinrichstraße 26, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5424-3540
Achim D HerrmannDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Harrison SmithSchool of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-6004, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8806-9659
Micha HoracekInstitute of Earth Sciences, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, Heinrichstraße 26, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2471-1232
Ariel D AnbarSchool of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-6004, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6015-7750
Arizona State University · USChina University of Geosciences · CNLouisiana State University · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of Graz · ATUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explaining the ~5-million-year delay in marine biotic recovery following the latest Permian mass extinction, the largest biotic crisis of the Phanerozoic, is a fundamental challenge for both geological and biological sciences. Ocean redox perturbations may have played a critical role in this delayed recovery. However, the lack of quantitative constraints on the details of Early Triassic oceanic anoxia (for example, time, duration, and extent) leaves the links between oceanic conditions and the delayed biotic recovery ambiguous. We report high-resolution U-isotope (δ

Identifiers

PMID29651454
PMCPMC5895439
OpenAlexW2797708712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.