Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29651383›Full record

ArticleCulture and brain2017

Influence of encoding instructions and response bias on cross-cultural differences in specific recognition.

Laura E Paige, Selen Amado, Angela H Gutchess

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Culture and brain, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Mnemicity: A Cognitive Gadget?Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cross-Cultural Differences in Memory Specificity: Investigation of Candidate Mechanisms.Journal of applied research in memory and cognition · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Influence of culture and age on the self-reference effect.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2020
    Article
  9. Cultural specialization of visual cortex.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura E PaigeBrandeis University, 415 South St., MS 062, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.
Selen AmadoBrandeis University, 415 South St., MS 062, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.
Angela H GutchessBrandeis University, 415 South St., MS 062, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.
Brandeis University · US

Funding

TRAINING IN COGNITIVE AGING IN A SOCIAL CONTEXTT32AG000204 · NIA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI WINGFIELD, ARTHUR · 1990 to 2017
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior cross-cultural research has reported cultural variations in memory. One study revealed that Americans remembered images with more perceptual detail than East Asians (Millar et al. in Cult Brain 1(2-4):138-157, 2013). However, in a later study, this expected pattern was not replicated, possibly due to differences in encoding instructions (Paige et al. in Cortex 91:250-261, 2017). The present study sought to examine when cultural variation in memory-related decisions occur and the role of instructions. American and East Asian participants viewed images of objects while making a

Indexed as

CognitionCultureMemoryResponse biasSpecificity

Identifiers

PMID29651383
PMCPMC5891323
OpenAlexW2765441182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.