Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29651371›Full record

ReviewCureus2018

Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Low-income Country-Nepal: Cost, Efficacy, and Safety.

Gaurav Nepal, Ghanshyam Kharel, Shaik Tanveer Ahamad, Babin Basnet

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06498323 (Intravenous Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment on Mobile Stroke Units, a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06498323 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Intravenous Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment on Mobile Stroke Units, a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled160ConditionsIntravenous, Thrombosis, Acute Ischemic StrokeArmstenecteplase
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Using Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: What Is the Hold Up?The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gaurav NepalMaharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine.
Ghanshyam KharelMaharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine.
Shaik Tanveer AhamadDepartment of Medicine, Deccan College of Medical Sciences.
Babin BasnetMaharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous alteplase is the only approved treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Tenecteplase, a genetically engineered, mutant tissue plasminogen activator, is an alternative thrombolytic agent. The economic feasibility of stroke treatment has been a matter of huge debate and discussion thus far. The use of thrombolytics for the management of ischemic stroke has recently begun in Nepal. In low-income countries like Nepal, where the per capita income falls at just $691.7 and 25.2% of the population are under the poverty line, stroke patients cannot meet treatment expenses. Tenecteplase is easily available (for the management of acute coronary syndrome) in tertiary-level hospitals of Nepal and the price quote of tenecteplase ($450) is half the price of alteplase ($1000). In emergency cases, sometimes, the cost of alteplase can be greater than the patient can afford and they can't undergo thrombolysis even after arriving on time. However, evidence exists that supports the use of other alternatives (tenecteplase), which are also effective in the management of acute ischemic stroke. In this article, we examined current evidence for the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase when compared to alteplase. This review will make neurologists in Nepal familiar with the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in comparison with alteplase since it is common for patients to not be able to afford the expensive alteplase, which makes guideline-based practice impossible some times.

Indexed as

alteplaseischemic strokelow income countrynepaltenecteplase

Identifiers

PMID29651371
PMCPMC5890961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.