Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29651367›Full record

ArticleCureus2018

"Lazarus Response" to Olaparib in a Virtually Chemonaive Breast Cancer Patient Carrying Gross BRCA2 Gene Deletion.

Vladimir M Moiseyenko, Vyacheslav A Chubenko, Fedor V Moiseyenko, Lyudmila A Zagorskaya, Yuliya A Zaytseva, Nataliya E Gesha, Evgeny N Zykov, Valeriya I Ni, Elena V Preobrazhenskaya, Anna P Sokolenko and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cytotoxic and targeted therapy for BRCA1/2-driven cancers.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2021
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Vladimir M MoiseyenkoDirector, City Cancer Center, Saint Petersburg.
Vyacheslav A ChubenkoDepartment of Chemotherapy, City Cancer Center, Saint Petersburg.
Fedor V MoiseyenkoDepartment of Chemotherapy, City Cancer Center, Saint Petersburg.
Lyudmila A ZagorskayaDepartment of Chemotherapy, City Cancer Center, Saint Petersburg.
Yuliya A ZaytsevaDepartment of Chemotherapy, City Cancer Center, Saint Petersburg.
Nataliya E GeshaDepartment of Chemotherapy, City Cancer Center, Saint Petersburg.
Evgeny N ZykovLaboratory of Nuclear Diagnostics, City Cancer Center, Saint Petersburg.
Valeriya I NiDepartment of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, Saint Petersburg.
Elena V PreobrazhenskayaDepartment of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, Saint Petersburg.
Anna P SokolenkoDepartment of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, Saint Petersburg.
Evgeny N ImyanitovDepartment of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, Saint Petersburg.
Institute of Oncology NN Petrov · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report describes an estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patient, who relapsed at two and a half years after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy while being on the aromatase inhibition. Based on the clinical evidence for potential sensitivity of the tumor to hormone ablation, everolimus was added to continuing exemestane treatment. Oral chemotherapy was administered at further disease progression, however, it lasted only for 10 days due to rapidly deteriorating condition of the patient. BRCA test was performed just before the failure of endocrine therapy and revealed a gross deletion within BRCA2 gene. Since the patient already developed contraindications to the standard chemotherapy, olaparib (300 mg twice a day) was given as a last hope option. The patient demonstrated a "Lazarus response": the performance status and the results of the biochemical tests went back to the norm within first two weeks of treatment. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed at one month after the start of olaparib therapy, and revealed complete metabolic response for all multiple metastatic lesions located in the liver, bones, small pelvis, lungs, mediastinum, retroperitoneum, etc. Cytotoxic therapy and poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are known to have virtually identical mechanisms of tumor escape from the treatment, which are confined to the restoration of BRCA proficiency within cancer cells. The pronounced tumor response to the treatment in this patient can be attributed to the lack of recent exposure to standard cytotoxic treatment as well as to the inability of tumors with gross BRCA rearrangements to restore BRCA function via secondary mutation. This observation calls for comprehensive evaluation of PARP inhibitors in chemonaive patients with hereditary cancer.

Indexed as

brca2breast cancergross rearrangementsolaparibparp inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID29651367
PMCPMC5890964
OpenAlexW2786024123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.