Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29650991›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

A new way of producing pediocin in Pediococcus acidilactici through intracellular stimulation by internalized inulin nanoparticles.

Whee-Soo Kim, Jun-Yeong Lee, Bijay Singh, Sushila Maharjan, Liang Hong, Sang-Mok Lee, Lian-Hua Cui, Ki-June Lee, GiRak Kim, Cheol-Heui Yun and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Impact ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Current research in food science · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Whee-Soo KimDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Yeong LeeDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Bijay SinghResearch Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3125-3655
Sushila MaharjanResearch Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3957-3976
Liang HongDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Mok LeeDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3728-9309
Lian-Hua CuiCo-Innovation Center of Beef Cattle Science and Industry Technology, Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin, 133002, P. R. China.
Ki-June LeeDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
GiRak KimDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Cheol-Heui YunDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Kee KangInstitute of Green-Bio Science & Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang, Gangwon-do, 25354, Republic of Korea.
Yun-Jaie ChoiDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. cyjcow@snu.ac.kr.
Chong-Su ChoDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. chocs@snu.ac.kr.
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University of Science and Technology · KRYanbian University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most challenging aspects of probiotics as a replacement for antibiotics is to enhance their antimicrobial activity against pathogens. Given that prebiotics stimulate the growth and/or activity of probiotics, we developed phthalyl inulin nanoparticles (PINs) as prebiotics and observed their effects on the cellular and antimicrobial activities of Pediococcus acidilactici (PA). First, we assessed the internalization of PINs into PA. The internalization of PINs was largely regulated by glucose transporters in PA, and the process was energy-dependent. Once internalized, PINs induced PA to produce substantial amounts of antimicrobial peptide (pediocin), which is effective against both Gram-positive (Salmonella Gallinarum) and Gram-negative (Listeria monocytogenes) pathogens. When treated with small-sized PINs, PA witnessed a nine-fold increase in antimicrobial activity. The rise in pediocin activity in PA treated with PINs was accompanied by enhanced expression of stress response genes (groEL, groES, dnaK) and pediocin biosynthesis genes (pedA, pedD). Although the mechanism is not clear, it appears that the internalization of PINs by PA causes mild stress to activate the PA defense system, leading to increased production of pediocin. Overall, we identified a prebiotic in nanoparticle form for intracellular stimulation of probiotics, demonstrating a new avenue for the biological production of antimicrobial peptides.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsCytoplasmGene Expression RegulationHumansInulinListeria monocytogenesNanoparticlesPediocinsPediococcus acidilacticiProbioticsAnti-Infective AgentsInulinPediocins

Identifiers

PMID29650991
PMCPMC5897564
OpenAlexW2806966748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.