Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29650952›Full record

ReviewNature communications2018

Progress and challenges towards targeted delivery of cancer therapeutics.

Daniel Rosenblum, Nitin Joshi, Wei Tao, Jeffrey M Karp, Dan Peer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 833 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
833citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

833 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Analyzing Molecular Determinants of Nanodrugs' Cytotoxic Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Secondary Site Ligand for Integrin αVβ3 Enables Targeted mRNA Delivery.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Reality of Active Targeting in Nanomedicine: Promise Versus Performance.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

773 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel RosenblumLaboratory of Precision NanoMedicine, School of Molecular Cell Biology and Biotechnology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Department of Materials Sciences and Engineering, Iby and Aladar Fleischman Faculty of Engineering; Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Cancer Biology Research Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel.
Nitin JoshiCenter for Nanomedicine and Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Wei TaoCenter for Nanomedicine and Department of Anesthesiology and, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4277-3728
Jeffrey M KarpCenter for Nanomedicine and Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. jmkarp@bwh.harvard.edu.
Dan PeerLaboratory of Precision NanoMedicine, School of Molecular Cell Biology and Biotechnology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Department of Materials Sciences and Engineering, Iby and Aladar Fleischman Faculty of Engineering; Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Cancer Biology Research Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel. peer@tauex.tau.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8238-0673

Funding

Engineered Induction of a Stem Cell Homing ResponseR01HL095722 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KARP, JEFFREY MICHAEL · 2010 to 2018
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL095722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted delivery approaches for cancer therapeutics have shown a steep rise over the past few decades. However, compared to the plethora of successful pre-clinical studies, only 15 passively targeted nanocarriers (NCs) have been approved for clinical use and none of the actively targeted NCs have advanced past clinical trials. Herein, we review the principles behind targeted delivery approaches to determine potential reasons for their limited clinical translation and success. We propose criteria and considerations that must be taken into account for the development of novel actively targeted NCs. We also highlight the possible directions for the development of successful tumor targeting strategies.

Indexed as

Drug CarriersAntineoplastic AgentsDrug ApprovalDrug CompoundingHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNanomedicineNanoparticlesNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Carriers

Identifiers

PMID29650952
PMCPMC5897557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.