Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29650757›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2018

Conformational flexibility within the nascent polypeptide-associated complex enables its interactions with structurally diverse client proteins.

Esther M Martin, Matthew P Jackson, Martin Gamerdinger, Karina Gense, Theodoros K Karamonos, Julia R Humes, Elke Deuerling, Alison E Ashcroft, Sheena E Radford

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Fidelity of Cotranslational Protein Targeting to the Endoplasmic Reticulum.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. NMR illuminates intrinsic disorder.Current opinion in structural biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Chaperone Interactions at the Ribosome.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2019
    Review
  17. Modulation of Amyloid States by Molecular Chaperones.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Esther M MartinFrom the Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom and.
Matthew P JacksonFrom the Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom and.
Martin Gamerdingerthe Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Microbiology, University of Konstanz, 78454 Konstanz, Germany.
Karina Gensethe Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Microbiology, University of Konstanz, 78454 Konstanz, Germany.
Theodoros K KaramonosFrom the Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom and.
Julia R HumesFrom the Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom and.
Elke Deuerlingthe Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Microbiology, University of Konstanz, 78454 Konstanz, Germany.
Alison E AshcroftFrom the Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom and.
Sheena E RadfordFrom the Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom and s.e.radford@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3079-8039
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

Mechanism of an Acid Activated ChaperoneR01GM102829 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BARDWELL, JAMES, JAKOB, URSULA H. · 2013 to 2016
$1.8M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E012558/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M012573/1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102829Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 089311/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 094232Wellcome Trust 105615/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As newly synthesized polypeptides emerge from the ribosome, it is crucial that they fold correctly. To prevent premature aggregation, nascent chains interact with chaperones that facilitate folding or prevent misfolding until protein synthesis is complete. Nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC) is a ribosome-associated chaperone that is important for protein homeostasis. However, how NAC binds its substrates remains unclear. Using native electrospray ionization MS (ESI-MS), limited proteolysis, NMR, and cross-linking, we analyzed the conformational properties of NAC from

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCrystallography, X-RayMolecular ChaperonesPeptidesProtein BindingProtein FoldingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsSynucleinsCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsMolecular Chaperonesnascent-polypeptide-associated complexPeptidesSynucleinschaperonemolecular chaperoneNAC native mass spectrometry (MS)nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)protein cross-linkingprotein foldingprotein misfolding

Identifiers

PMID29650757
PMCPMC5986199
OpenAlexW2798148204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.