Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29650686›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2018

Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Cancer: Practical Considerations for the Management of Patients with Nausea or Vomiting.

Hanno Riess, Cihan Ay, Rupert Bauersachs, Cecilia Becattini, Jan Beyer-Westendorf, Francis Cajfinger, Ian Chau, Alexander T Cohen, Alok A Khorana, Anthony Maraveyas and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Managing the competing risks of thrombosis, bleeding, and anticoagulation in patients with malignancy.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Hanno RiessDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Charité, University Hospital, Berlin, Germany hanno.riess@charite.de.
Cihan AyClinical Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Rupert BauersachsDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Darmstadt Hospital, Darmstadt, Germany.
Cecilia BecattiniDepartment of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Jan Beyer-WestendorfThrombosis Research Unit, Department of Medicine I, Division of Haematology, University Hospital "Carl Gustav Carus" Dresden, Germany.
Francis CajfingerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Ian ChauGastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK.
Alexander T CohenThrombosis and Thrombophilia Unit, Department of Haematology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alok A KhoranaDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Anthony MaraveyasJoint Centre of Cancer Studies, Hull York Medical School, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK.
Marcos RenniNational Institute of Cancer, Ministry of Health, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Annie M YoungCancer Research Centre, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Castle Hill Hospital · GBCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECleveland Clinic · USGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBMedical University of Vienna · ATMinistério da Saúde · BRPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have proven efficacy and safety and are approved for use in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and those with atrial fibrillation (AF). There is no clear guidance on the use of DOACs in the significant proportion of these patients who have or will develop concomitant cancer. The occurrence of nausea and vomiting in these patients, despite implementation of guideline-recommended antiemetic strategies, is a particular concern because it may affect oral drug intake and consequently outcomes with anticoagulation therapy.Here, we review recent data on the incidence and management of cancer-associated nausea and vomiting and the current evidence and guidance relating to the use of DOACs in patients with cancer. On the basis of this evidence, an international working group of experts in the fields of cancer-associated thrombosis/hemostasis, hematology, and oncology discussed key issues related to the use of DOACs in patients with VTE or AF and cancer who are at risk of nausea and vomiting and developed some consensus recommendations. We present these consensus recommendations, which outline strategies for the use and management of anticoagulants, including DOACs, in patients with VTE or AF and cancer for whom oral drug intake may pose challenges. Guidance is provided on managing patients with gastrointestinal obstruction or nausea and vomiting that is caused by cancer treatments or other cancer-related factors.The recommendations outlined in this review provide a useful reference for health care professionals and will help to improve the management of anticoagulation in patients with VTE or AF and cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer several advantages over traditional anticoagulants, including ease of administration and the lack of need for routine monitoring. However, the management of patients with an indication for anticoagulation and concomitant cancer, who are at high risk of thromboembolic events, presents several challenges for administering oral therapies, particularly with regard to the risk of nausea and vomiting. In the absence of robust data from randomized trials and specific guidelines, consensus recommendations were developed for healthcare professionals regarding the use of DOACs in patients with cancer, with a focus on the management of patients who are at risk of nausea and vomiting.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnticoagulantsAntiemeticsHumansNauseaNeoplasmsVenous ThromboembolismVomitingAnticoagulantsAntiemeticsAnticoagulantsAtrial fibrillationNausea and vomitingNeoplasmsVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID29650686
PMCPMC6058321
OpenAlexW2884875155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.