Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29650363›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2018

Chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy after surgery and preoperative chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer (CRITICS): an international, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

Annemieke Cats, Edwin P M Jansen, Nicole C T van Grieken, Karolina Sikorska, Pehr Lind, Marianne Nordsmark, Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg, Henk Boot, Anouk K Trip, H A Maurits Swellengrebel and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 279 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
279citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
46.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

279 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 565 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer (2023).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Evolution of treatment in gastric cancer- a systematic review.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Prognostic value of tumor markers and ctDNA in patients with resectable gastric cancer receiving perioperative treatment: results from the CRITICS trial.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

219 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Annemieke CatsDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Edwin P M JansenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: epm.jansen@nki.nl.
Nicole C T van GriekenDepartment of Pathology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Karolina SikorskaDepartment of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Pehr LindDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marianne NordsmarkDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Elma Meershoek-Klein KranenbargDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Henk BootDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Anouk K TripDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
H A Maurits SwellengrebelDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Hein PutterDepartment of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Johanna W van SandickDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mark I van Berge HenegouwenDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Henk H HartgrinkDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Harm van TinterenDepartment of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Cornelis J H van de VeldeDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Marcel VerheijDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
CRITICS investigators
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLAarhus University Hospital · DKAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth perioperative chemotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy improve survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer from Europe and North America. To our knowledge, these treatment strategies have not been investigated in a head to head comparison. We aimed to compare perioperative chemotherapy with preoperative chemotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma.

methodsIn this investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older who had stage IB- IVA resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma (as defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer, sixth edition), with a WHO performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate cardiac, bone marrow, liver, and kidney function. Patients were enrolled from 56 hospitals in the Netherlands, Sweden, and Denmark, and were randomly assigned (1:1) with a computerised minimisation programme with a random element to either perioperative chemotherapy (chemotherapy group) or preoperative chemotherapy with postoperative chemoradiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy group). Randomisation was done before patients were given any preoperative chemotherapy treatment and was stratified by histological subtype, tumour localisation, and hospital. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. Surgery consisted of a radical resection of the primary tumour and at least a D1+ lymph node dissection. Postoperative treatment started within 4-12 weeks after surgery. Chemotherapy consisted of three preoperative 21-day cycles and three postoperative cycles of intravenous epirubicin (50 mg/m

findingsBetween Jan 11, 2007, and April 17, 2015, 788 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to chemotherapy (n=393) or chemoradiotherapy (n=395). After preoperative chemotherapy, 372 (95%) of 393 patients in the chemotherapy group and 369 (93%) of 395 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group proceeded to surgery, with a potentially curative resection done in 310 (79%) of 393 patients in the chemotherapy group and 326 (83%) of 395 in the chemoradiotherapy group. Postoperatively, 233 (59%) of 393 patients started chemotherapy and 245 (62%) of 395 started chemoradiotherapy. At a median follow-up of 61·4 months (IQR 43·3-82·8), median overall survival was 43 months (95% CI 31-57) in the chemotherapy group and 37 months (30-48) in the chemoradiotherapy group (hazard ratio from stratified analysis 1·01 (95% CI 0·84-1·22; p=0·90). After preoperative chemotherapy, in the total safety population of 781 patients (assessed together), there were 368 (47%) grade 3 adverse events; 130 (17%) grade 4 adverse events, and 13 (2%) deaths. Causes of death during preoperative treatment were diarrhoea (n=2), dihydropyrimidine deficiency (n=1), sudden death (n=1), cardiovascular events (n=8), and functional bowel obstruction (n=1). During postoperative treatment, grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 113 (48%) and 22 (9%) of 233 patients in the chemotherapy group, respectively, and in 101 (41%) and ten (4%) of 245 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group, respectively. Non-febrile neutropenia occurred more frequently during postoperative chemotherapy (79 [34%] of 233) than during postoperative chemoradiotherapy (11 [4%] of 245). No deaths were observed during postoperative treatment.

interpretationPostoperative chemoradiotherapy did not improve overall survival compared with postoperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable gastric cancer treated with adequate preoperative chemotherapy and surgery. In view of the poor postoperative patient compliance in both treatment groups, future studies should focus on optimising preoperative treatment strategies.

fundingDutch Cancer Society, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group, and Hoffmann-La Roche.

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationGastrectomyNeoadjuvant TherapyAdenocarcinomaAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, AdjuvantEuropeFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID29650363
OpenAlexW2797145364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.